• Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    “hierarchy of kings is the consequences of anarchy, a political system devoted to the abolition of hierarchy”

    Do you really not understand how stupid you sound?

    “Rule of Law replaced Rule of Kings”

    Do you not know the phrase “the king’s word is law”? You have literally zero clue what you’re talking about and just spouting bullshit. Literally, zero clue if you believe that the decrees of kings weren’t laws. The only difference is who held authority to dictate laws, going from kings to a body of elected representatives.

    You just don’t get it and I don’t have the time to explain anarchism to you and the evolution of hierarchical governments. You’re just heavily misinformed.

        • Steve@communick.news
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          I’m asking because you quoted a statement with the phrase hierarchy of kings. But I never used that phrase, so I’m not sure who you’re quoting.

          I would say calling anarchy a Political System, is something like calling a blank canvas a painting.
          Anarchy is the absence of a system. Once a system is in place, there’s no longer anarchy.