• jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    In their suit, bike lane opponents, who include popular Astoria businesses like Parisi Bakery, Sotto la Luna and King Souvlaki, argued that the project would “jeopardize” the safety of cyclists and “increase the likelihood of injuries” to pedestrians — despite city data and mounds of research showing protected bike lanes do the exact opposite.

    Said opponents need to be barred from further speaking on the topic. Lying should lose you credibility. Being full-ass wrong should as well.

    Fuck cars. I just wanna ride a bike and not worry about dying.

  • Fredselfish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    78
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    Why the fuck does a judge get to say what the city does. Defi the order hell Trump does.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Anyone can file suit. A judge needs to pass judgement. Hopefully the judge based it on something more legitimate than whining.

    • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      The will quickly find someone responsible and put them in jail. Democrats would say there’s no way to enforce it. Republicans don’t fuck around.

    • watson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      20
      ·
      1 day ago

      Is that what you really want? More people acting like Donald Trump?

        • watson@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          15
          ·
          1 day ago

          Yeah, sure, fascism bad, however, I’m not sure that, in this case, a bit of judicial assholery is tantamount to fascism. This decision can be appealed and possibly reversed by a higher court.

          • sem@piefed.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            29
            ·
            1 day ago

            Looks like the judge is reversing it based on nothing but carbrain, calling the bike lane “arbitrary” and “capricious”. Looks like this whole court is out of order.

            • AA5B@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              22 hours ago

              The key words I pick out are “in violation of lawful procedure”. I don’t like this choice either, but it looks like the city took a shortcut

              • sem@piefed.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                21 hours ago

                Ah I didn’t see that part, thank you.

                Yeah the judge doesn’t sound so wrong any more.

                I guess it depends on if DOT actually violated the law or the judge is ruling on a stretch. I wish had more details.

                • AA5B@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  17 hours ago

                  No kidding. All too often even clear looking articles seem to have important details missing

            • watson@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 day ago

              I’m pretty sure there’s gonna be an appeal. The judge gave 30 days before the order must be executed. He also denied all of the other claims.

              This is not a ruling that should be difficult to get reversed on appeal

          • arrow74@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            17
            ·
            1 day ago

            Public funding was used as directed by public officials to build public infrastructure. A judge orders it torn up with no legal basis, attempting to circumvent not only the will of the people, but the law.

            It’s certainly not democratic

            • Newsteinleo@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 hours ago

              Just because its not democratic does not make it fascist. When you throw words around hap hazardusly they lose meaning.

      • MojoMcJojo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        1 day ago

        Trump ignores the wants of the many to benefit the few. When the many stand up to the few, it’s not the same as what Trump does, it’s the opposite.

      • Steve@communick.news
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Morally you’re right of course. Everyone should follow laws and procedures. Even when others don’t. No disagreement.

        But there is a line from the first Foundation book. I’ll paraphrase: Don’t let your sense of morality stop you from doing the right thing.

        When you’re playing against a cheater. You’ll follow the rules every time, and loose every time. Which is fine in a game. Especially when you know someone is inforcing the rules and the cheater will be stopped. But when when actual lives are on the line? And the ref is the one cheating? Going against your moral code to do the right thing, becomes the moral thing to do.

        That’s what RobbinHood was all about.

      • crunchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        I want everyone to stop tripping over themselves to comply with dumb “orders” like this. If that means taking a page out of Trump’s playbook and ignoring them, then yeah, fuck it.

  • katy ✨@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    1 day ago

    rip up the bike lane and turn it into a sidewalk then rip up the street and turn it into a streetcar and bike lane.

  • akilou@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 day ago

    “DOT shall take all steps reasonably necessary to restore 31st Street between 31st Avenue and Newtown Avenue … to substantially the same traffic markings, land configuration, and parking and loading regulations that existed immediately prior to commencement of work on the Safety Project in August 2025,”

    Why August 2025? Why not August 1925 or 1725?

  • 9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    If that thumbnail pic is accurate, i dont even see a bike lane… i see two paint lines too close together. Looks super unsafe. I wouldnt even ride in that “bike lane”. I’d prefer to just ride in city traffic like of one of those insane bike couriers

    Imagine the ruling was actually: “judge orders bike lane removed… and replaced with an actual separated bike lane…”

    • njm1314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      24 hours ago

      The thumbnail picture is accurate it’s just that there’s cars illegally parked in the bike lane. The bike Lane is on the far left.