• theUwUhugger@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        17
        ·
        8 months ago

        Someone who is scientifically illiterate to plead someone else’s argument is far less bad as being so ideologically blinded as to be incapable of accepting that ‘a’ thing was done by your tribe!

    • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      8 months ago

      What?

      You asked for statistics, and here are the statistics.

      And spiking a flat-earther isn’t the flex you think it is. I could probably spike a 2nd grader, but I wouldn’t brag about doing it.

      • theUwUhugger@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        8 months ago

        I could not comprehend why anyone would use that word there… Do you think it would be an intelligent thing to say that black people must be behind crime ‘a’ or say this crime, because statistically they commit more crime? Oh, but this nonsense must work in your proposition because its in favor of your rhetoric!

        That was not a flex, it was an insult :))

        • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          8 months ago

          I could not comprehend

          You could have stopped there.

          Click links, read links. The information is there for you, if you’d take a moment to learn.

          • theUwUhugger@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            8 months ago

            And I am sure that those statistics are right! Comparably why don’t you believe that a black person committed this crime? They are statistically more likely to commit crimes!