I would disagree with the sentiment, but agree with the plan though not with its realization!

It is in our best interest to have a healthy society, hard drugs and even serious addiction to less powerful drugs is an issue not only from our responsibility as humans, but financially (guess the second one only applies to non-americans)! Allowing hard drugs but opening such clinics that make their use safe and possibly provide the nec resources is so far statistically the most effective method against such addictions!

You would get to do whatever you want (in the parameters you drew up) and I would get to live in a better country! I think we would both win with my method

Nor in taste! Uranium app tastes like sour candy!!!

Well cells wouldn’t be circle shaped, but would it actually be to the detriment of life in that or other ways?

Maybe cells could take a more pragmatic shape, like tactical dicks

Aha! But languical constructs allow and do allow hyperboles! So it could be argued that the colleague asked for the minimum allowed by our bindings law!

I request a motion to dismiss your dismissal :>

Which stand for?

Beep boop

Doubt the person knew english to put this up, assuming for whatever reason that this is real!

So sticking to freeware either a wonky google translate or ai! Well, google translate would have been less coherent, maybe to the point of non-understandability and would have been posted here regardless… But yea, would have been the better choice

So kneeling is fine when they are pretending to believe in a god?

Gzsínyiusz

“The term “Any Darn” is not a reference to a specific person. It’s a colloquial expression using “darn” as a euphemism for “damn” to express mild annoyance or frustration. “Darn” is a minced oath, a less offensive substitute for stronger expletives. It can be used as an adjective, adverb, or interjection to emphasize something or express displeasure. “?

Google does not recognize anyone umder that name?

Ah yes! The communist atheist system, and the christian nazi belief are non-comparable because that would be counterproductive to your point!

No

You either have cognitive issues or you think wasting my time is funny

-What is the name of a politician that was mentioned in the post? You have the guy who promised to do the thing -While I cannot physically imagine why you are expecting hundreds of pages of a political program on lemmy instead of taking your lil hands and looking it up yourself, which I won’tbe doing for you, you know whats the supposed endgoal is! And then you can look up your preferrred analyst and choose to believe them or not!

And I am being obtuse…

…you didn’t refer to anything, you just put a link in? Superb!

How is it non-comparable to your ridiculous point? If Stalin was evil because of his religious beliefs which was atheist; then hitler too was evil because of his religious beliefs which was christianity!

Christian god was mentioned in the very first chapter of sieg hail; and his personal unit, the ss wore ‘in god we trust’ on their belts

?

Its not about hard work, its about being right

You do know this is not the fun kind of trolling? I don’t mimd you taking 30 seconds of my time

Don’t speak german, nor am I capable of comprehending why you would link a link about the soviet part of germanies relationship with the church at the question of ‘by your thouught process is nazi germany christian; are their actions to be atributed to christianity’

Russia claims that their invasion is justified because ukraine supposedly massacred Russians… Ukranians who are russian according to russia…

If you were to take the middle rode somehow for some reason you would decry both sides as in the wrong

Communism is not based on atheism…? Is nazism christian because Hitler was catholic?