Pornography and violence or whatever are being age gated in the corporate web but the biggest players get to sell sex chats to kids. Pedophilia is legal as long as there is ad revenue to be made.
I guess he really needed the $1.39 he was getting every year from them.
deleted by creator
Neil, you’re welcome here on the Fediverse.
better decades late than never, i suppose
What’s the context? Haven’t heard about Meta anything in a while.
When I read the headlines about this initially yesterday I was like ‘oh, is this a conservative thing where they’re mad about kids asking the chat bot questions about sex?’
So I read the examples, and HOLY SHIT it is so not that! There is no way to describe it except erotic roleplay that is explicitly about children.
Given the prompt examples I am skeptical that any child would write them, they sound more like shit they grabbed off some pedo ERP site.
Pedophiles do Enterprise Resource Planning?
Neil has never resembled a Conservative. When he holds a position you can assume it’s backed by facts.
Honestly I’m not familiar with him (I’m fairly musically ignorant), it was just my initial doubt because that’s the form of ‘think of the children!’ that I’m most familiar with. But damn, sometimes you really do have to think of them, because those examples were disturbing.
It sounds like some idiot working at Meta used an LLM to produce that internal document. Those “acceptable things to say” quotes are just stupid. They have to be quotes an LLM added to the document, unnoticed. There’s no way a human wrote them, or even copied and pasted into the doc, and said, “These are acceptable.” I refuse to believe that.
