• 1 Post
  • 407 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 8th, 2023

help-circle




  • yetAnotherUser@lemmy.catoTechnology@lemmy.worldA/I Shuts Down, Stay Human
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    That’s why it’s better to just say anti-fascist. Anti-fascist is nowadays the clearest term for it. “Antifa” is constantly being used as a word for “your enemy”, so using the same word but with another meaning can become confusing to people who don’t know the antifa movement that well (which, let’s be honest, it’s most people).






  • yetAnotherUser@lemmy.cato196@lemmy.blahaj.zonepro rule
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    13 days ago

    Assuming you aren’t joking…

    “It” being a pronoun would only become a problem if the challenge was the following: “while talking about that person, you cannot use any pronouns”.
    However, the current challenge is instead “you cannot refer to this person using any pronouns, because the person has none”. That means we can refer to things other than the person with pronouns. And that’s what Anarki_ does. If you don’t believe it yet, look at the spoilered text above, where I show what each of the pronouns is referring to.

    Click Me! :D

    Maria says gets it […]

    Pronoun referring to: the removal of ex-wife’s pronouns by the ex-wife that the OP refers to.


    […] and that it makes sense.

    Pronoun referring to: the same thing as last time.


    […] - even if it would be funny to Maria.

    Pronoun referring to: not putting anything to refer to the ex-wife mentioned in the OP


    As you can see, no pronouns refer to either Maria or to the ex-wife, but to actions and things said by these two persons. :D


  • yetAnotherUser@lemmy.cato196@lemmy.blahaj.zonepro rule
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    13 days ago

    Maria says gets it, and that it makes sense.

    I don’t know if “Maria says gets it” is a gramatically correct English phrase. In case it isn’t, I would either use…

    Maria says Maria gets it, and that it makes sense

    …or get rid of the passive phrasing for clarity, like this…

    Maria says something similar to the following: “Maria gets it. It makes sense.”





  • Fair. In that case, if I were to teach you a board game, I’d just quickly say the game’s goal and immediately start a trial run of the game, and only explain rules when I deemed them relevant, or when someone would ask something.

    For more complex games, I’ve also made people play “simplified” versions of the game, and adding rules of the game to the mix whenever I saw that people were getting more comfortable with the game (for example, that’s imo that’s the best way to teach Mahjong).

    I can imagine that could also be annoying to many people, not knowing how to fully play a game while playing it. But I think it’s WAY better than something like people listening to every rule of the game for 20 minutes, without them interacting with the game. If I did that, they wouldn’t even remember all the rules whenever they would start playing, so I don’t think the explanations would be that useful at all… @~@ I also can imagine lots of people who like board games either being unable or not wanting to take the same approaches as I do with teaching board games.