- 8 Posts
- 8 Comments
onehundredsixtynine@sh.itjust.worksto
Firefox@lemmy.ml•I think nobody wants AI in Firefox, Mozilla
16·8 days agoThis still doesn’t mean Google has some kind of ownership for it. Nobody stops you from forking it and taking it into a different direction.
onehundredsixtynine@sh.itjust.worksto
Firefox@lemmy.ml•I think nobody wants AI in Firefox, Mozilla
6·8 days agoai shit is all easy to disable
Users don’t have to disable it. Just give them a browser where they’re not enabled by default!
onehundredsixtynine@sh.itjust.worksto
Firefox@lemmy.ml•I think nobody wants AI in Firefox, Mozilla
29·8 days agoGoogle tech
Chromium is open-source. It doesn’t belong to Google or anyone else.
onehundredsixtynine@sh.itjust.worksto
Firefox@lemmy.ml•I think nobody wants AI in Firefox, Mozilla
41·8 days agoThere aren’t better alternatives
They are literally mentioned in the article:
Those unhappy have another option: use an AI‑free Firefox fork such as LibreWolf, Waterfox, or Zen Browser.
- https://manualdousuario.net/en/mozilla-firefox-window-ai/.
onehundredsixtynine@sh.itjust.worksto
Firefox@lemmy.ml•I think nobody wants AI in Firefox, Mozilla
28·8 days agoYes. Chromium isn’t bad in itself though.
onehundredsixtynine@sh.itjust.worksto
Firefox@lemmy.ml•I think nobody wants AI in Firefox, Mozilla
121·8 days agoWhat do you mean by “we shouldn’t let perfect be the enemy of good”? Why should I use a browser which is actively anti-user when there are better alternatives out there?
onehundredsixtynine@sh.itjust.worksOPto
You Should Know@lemmy.world•YSK: there's a browser extension called "SingleFile", which allows you to save any page into a single HTML file.
5·2 months agoI can’t imagine why I would want to save the interface on a YouTube page
Archiving a community post, for example.





So what? They would have eventually done it without him.