https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hanlon's_razor

Good point!

Aha I misunderstood, thanks for clarifying.

Actually for this specific context, there’s an easy solution: I reckon for llms self-hosting would be the way to go, if your hardware supports it. I’ve heard a lot of the smaller models have gotten a lot more powerful over the last year.

This is any company, government, or other organisation with +80 employees. The two other alternatives are

1. Have all data in Excel with no data governance, robust procedures, or trust in data, as the organisation grows in size
2. Use only external tools (which in turn are owned by organisations that work like I described in my parent comment)

I’d love to hear of there’s other ways of doing this stuff that actually works, but so far I just haven’t experienced it in my career yet.

Not total bullshit, but it’s not great for all use cases:

For coding tasks the output looks good on the surface but often I end up changing stuff, meaning it would have been faster up do myself.

For coding I know little about (currently writing some GitHub actions), it’s great at explaining alternatives, pros and cons, to give me a rudimentary understanding of stuff

I’ve also used it to transcribe tutorial screencasts, and then afterwards having a secondary LLM use the transcription to generate documentation (include in prompt: "when relevant, generate examples, use markdown tables, generate plantuml etc)

As a person working in a field close to data engineering this sounds like they’re actually honest about the process.

Tldr: it’s not possible to “just delete” everything at once, even though we’d love to be able to.

There’s so many layers of where information is stored, and such insane amounts of data in their data platform. so running a clean up job to delete a single persons data in oltp databases, data lakes, dwh’s, backups, etc, would both be expensive and inefficient. Instead what they then do is to do it in stages: flip a flag somewhere (is_deleted = true) which lets it be removed from view initially, and then running periodic clean-up jobs.

I just say “sorry, I haven’t”. I think as long as you just try to acknowledge them in a good way, i.e. smiling, maintaining eye contact, being polite, so you still acknowledge them as the human being that they are.

Sure it’s bad to lie, but so is being insensitive with the truth, whether it’s “I wanna spend the money on myself” or “there are more effective ways to make a difference than giving money to you”

Sounds reasonable. Just agree with him that you don’t swallow the first time, and that he should let you know when he’s about to finish

If you trust him (if you don’t, why are you gonna have sex with him?), Be honest that you’re nervous, and talk scenarios so hopefully they seem less scary. E.g. agree in advance that the goal isn’t necessarily to make him cum. Then I’d consider trying on e.g. a banana first to get acquainted with having a long thing in your mouth. Consider watching/reading some guides, or ask an LLM for advice, e.g. how to talk to him about this to get less anxious. What are you anxious about, if I may ask?

Just downvote and move on

80 meters lol. I’ve lived in cities, where it’s always been less than 700 meters.

GiveWell is a charity that seeks to answer this exact question.

i see, thank you.

I think it’s just 3-4 in each direction, so if so something bad and you’re old, it would affect your grandkids, and if you’re young it would affect your grandparents

There are 2 of letters “r” in strawberry 🤖

as rumor suggests

From Wikipedia:

Numerous testimonies of North Korean defectorsconfirm the practice of kin punishment (연좌제, yeonjwaje literally “association system”) in North Korea, under which three to eight generations of a political offender’s family can be summarily imprisoned or executed.