I mean this seems really unserious. They make money off data, stop giving the creeps your data – that is the only way to do anything different.

Ah cool! I actually never noticed that!

They cannot win the war with nukes, so it would serve mostly as a way for Trump to move up the escalation ladder to a (perceived) point where he can claim they have “destroyed the Iranian nuclear program” and try to pull out.

Tehran would probably not be a target, too costly politically and will provoke a do-or-die response from the axis of resistance. There is very low chance that Iran capitulates if they get nuked.

This was a terrorist attack on all the satellite equipment still intact across the globe, just one example of the increasing anti-satelliteism rampant in our society.

The Iran, Russia, China and DPRK block is such a vibe. While the western block is vassalised to the extreme, these four are so different yet still united in anti-imperialism and for sovereignty.

I am unsure about the direct connection between imperialism and sexism, but for modern feminist theory I generally recommend Sara Ahmed who also runs a blog. She writes extensively on anti-colonial, postcolonial feminism and queer theory. I also think she has some article called “Critique on Gay Imperialism” or something like this also. I have a few of her books and think they’re quite good.

Trying to launder support for the Zionist state by putting the blame on current regime?

Yea, couldve maybe accomplished something if they did it in the 80s. It’s too late now for this, unless they juice that war budget up to $2 trillion, which they cant afford

It is very interesting that it isnt something new then. I know someone who studied in Germany in the 80s and they had ONLY oral exams for all their courses.

Ah so it is a kind of atomic reductionist argument – interesting!

Oh it’s nothing, just the regular stuff. At least once a year some ROK or “China democratic party” source tells western media he’s dead.

Seems like a reasonable thesis. As someone not too familiar with the philosophy part of cognitive science (or rather, not too familiar with non-materialist parts), how does Chalmerism incorporate dialectics/entropy as part of the model of consciousness? If consciousness is not a derivative of matter but something distinct, what makes it non-static?

They really are juicing up the necromancy machines, he was dead just yesterday according to western media…

“Parts of EU decision-making are being captured by corporate interests” lol, have these guys had their head in the sand for 70 years or what?

Take the job and learn. As individuals the best we can do is to develop our skills and understanding of the world. I would probably say no to working for the MIC but otherwise it is just isolationism and it will do you no good. We need smart, educated and skilled comrades in all fields, I hope you have a good time and learn a lot!

Everyone gets it, just a matter of time. When I was 10 my best friend died of ut, one of my grandmas has it, my dad had it, last month my friends mom got to know she’d be lucky if she survived until christmas.

I am 100% certain my mom is gonna get it aswell she doesnt use sunscreen and her skin is so damaged.

Wow that was a wild ride

Why would you be in Turkey if you were fleeing with $1 billion lol

Yea this is a common stereotype. Obviously I can only speak from my own experience in STEM, but the best teachers have generally been the professors who knew the material best, i.e. the most respected experts in their field.

The worst teachers were the professors who had to give a topic/course in a field or sub-field which werent their primary interest.

This seems a bit too generalized to draw any conclusions. Of all the teachers I’ve had issues with, there has been no clear category of subjects they taught. On the contrary, I don’t think I’ve ever had an issue with a STEM teacher.

Having also worked as a teacher for 12-15 year olds and I can tell you that of all the reasons teenagers “hated” STEM subjects, I don’t think me or my colleagues were the primary ones.