It will be. They have immunity. It’s entirely performative intimidation.

By federal marshals who don’t give a fuck. Because they already did it to a state judge, they’ll go after federal next.

There are less than 2000 federal judges, the Federalist Society has over 70,000 members. They have the man power and motivation to replace them over night. At which point the law says what the fuck they want it to.

What’s stopping them isn’t that they lack the resources to seize total control. It’s that they lack the resources to maintain control. And they’re never going to have them.

They’re expecting the judges to push back so they have an excuse to get rid of the judges.

I said nothing about being disarmed, or losing.

Holy crap, is that a tariff price or are they WAY too proud?

Of course it is, Bezos is selling 8647 merch right now and there’s not a peep about it.

Pretty sure I pull up with a semi full of fertilizer and I’d be their bestest friend.

I didn’t say armed resistance doesn’t work. I said your gun isn’t going to work.

If the government comes for me, they’re bringing more people than I can shoot. The first answer to that, is to prevent that from happening through political action. The second is that you don’t respond to that with a gun.

Everyone on Ruby ridge was armed, everyone in Waco was armed. They’re all dead for their troubles. A gun won’t fix that problem.

They’re looting on the way out. America is already cooked, this is the wealthy squeezing the last drops of wealth out.

I don’t know, every time I drink that much I forget.

You’re mistaking support for our way of life, with support for Trump. We could rise up, we could overrun our own government, on a fairly short time scale. But then we’re also in a civil war. Which even assuming we win, in the best possible amount of time, with the least casualties, we still have to rewrite our laws to stop this happening again.

Or, we can sit here and work the system we have. Take fewer casualties, destroy fewer buildings, and have the same, if not better, odds of success. While keeping as much as possible, and rewriting the laws so this doesn’t happen again. There are limits on Trump, and what the public will allow. They’re just not as touchy as what the rest of the world would allow. Most places operate with much smaller communities, where feedback is much quicker.

It wasn’t a Trump blow out, he won due to the rules of our system, by an incredibly small margin, and all the polls before hand were showing a toss up race, probably in Kamala’s favor by a small amount.

A mixture of honey, water, a cinnamon stick, and yeast. Capped off with a relief valve.

Harvard might be considering a lot of law suits right about now. Maybe a dozen for every holding Trump has anywhere.

A lot of people just want to be on the record as promoting non-violence as well. It looks WAY better when your social media posts come up in a trial.

Honestly I hope Newsom takes this fight and loses, even though I applaud the effort. It’s an unconstitutional overreach for a state to step into international trade and relations. But having the fight over it will both remind the rabid right why we have a federal government, and what they could lose if they keep going down this path.

AI that was trained by programmers that don’t understand the source code either.

What other channels was he in? Was he directing from another channel while being directed by Putin?