The same way that people don’t program on bits because of assembly, or on assembly because of C and such, or on C because of Python, why would people have to use Python (or whatever) if they can get help from AIs to do what they want?

Hmmm…

Stalinism didn’t survive that long though, so we should learn from the mistakes of the past and have Super-Stalinism with triple the gulags!

lol

It seems he held back when Chinese officials were attacked a few months back though, no?

lol

For mistakes etc you could probably ask it to do a second pass. You might even want to try a new, fresh chat so that it doesn’t know what the original was. That’s a good idea that I hadn’t thought about!

In some tests I was doing with using Qwen 0.6B LLMs for classification I did ask it multiple times and basically give more weight the more tries something appears in. In your case you can probably ask two different models and take anything translated equally both times as “good enough” and use an(other) LLM to check the remainining things, although the longer the sentence/text/key the less such a system is likely to help and the more the raw LLM abilities will be necessary.

And as for asking the LLMs for mistakes I was curious because big LLMs should be able to catch some mistakes due to reflexion…

(We’re going to need an AI community lol instead of posting to genzedong all the time)

I had made c/Singularity for things like this but most of the talks about AI/LLMs are on c/technology as it’s big.

then that’s additional context the LLM can use to understand what it’s translating by reading the key property.

I was just thinking that it would be easy to remove the keys for reduced tokens but treating it as extra context for the LLM makes a lot of sense.

Nice job!

And two questions: Do you ask the LLM after it’s done if there were mistakes or if there is anything that can be improved as well? And as for books and longer texts do you have to break them up or do you keep to things that can be done one go?

I am of the opinion that AI controlled ones arent the way things will go.

Maybe with some machine learning for targetting assistance at most. But a fully software piloted one seems pretty far off to me.

There are already drones with AI (mostly for final targeting and perhaps targeting acquisition) and I really doubt there won’t be a massive push for full automation of drones and humanoid bots as soon as it becomes feasible.

In the future, qnything less than fully automated resource extraction, production and war fighting seems like defeat to me.

There is a developer on YouTube that got his hands on a $50k G1 (with working hands) and he has been showing how to make it do things. I found it very interesting.

The basic idea, from what I understand, is that these robots are just now getting the software needed to actually stand and move around without falling, and that’s basically all these robots are shipped with. Anything other than walking and running needs to be programmed to be done, but now that we have LLMs it’s just beginning to be possible to program the robots to automatically decide how to move around and how to interact with the environment.

So, because of that, money and effort are now increasingly being invested into developing these robots into fully automous, and consequently the the prices are now quickly falling because the production at scale is finally happening in anticipation of the software needed being developed soon.

Likelly the people profiting from the war in the US (billionaries, politicians and such) didn’t like that the ‘institutions’ they set up to ensure money goes to the right people are being coopted/taken over by their puppet.

She could be holding a Pravda on one hand and some dank Communist memes on the other for even more effect. lol

Those look like cute and functional houses. Hope they can build much more!

As long as they don’t really compromise that can work, otherwise all the things they compromised on that will be bad for the population will be sold by the media as their ideas, while any good they make is likely to get drowned under all the negative propaganda.

Any lack of retaliation will be seen as a green light for more attacks and even the yanks are likely to join in. Any retaliation will also result in more attacks but at least this way Iran can reduce the colonists capabilities which they will inevitably have to do.

The question is, will waiting to attack favour Iran or the imperialists?

If Iran can get new military gear (like from China,) but only during the “truce”, reorganize and root out traitors then waiting a while may be the best move, but they don’t have forever for that.

They have already broken it but so far it was “small enough” that Iran didn’t retaliate.

In a better world Iran would get a massive emergency delivery of AA systems and would take any small incursion by drones to pummel the colonists back to the stone age, specially around Gaza. But I’m not expecting the resumement of hostilities to go so well.

They want to normalise striking Iran while using the counter attacks as anti-Iranian propaganda to push for more attacks. They’ve been doing similar things against Russia.

Could wait at least until all three countries send their representatives somewhere to talk about some sort of cessation of attack. Probably more.

Iran showed the yanks that they won’t do anything worthy of attention when they are attacked in their most precious infraestructure, so now the US is going to escalate in some other way. Rinse and repeat.

Either that or they are doing what Russia did in Syria wrt Chemical weapons. The US said they would attack unless Syria gave up its chemical weapon, the last part being a joke that Russia accepeted as true and made the US accept it.

I guess there is a non zero chance of Iran saying that because they know an attack is coming so they say they agree to it starting before such an attack comes, while being reafy for either outcome.

Doubt it’s the case but who knows.

If that’s true it just sounds really dumb…

…so it might be true.

I wonder if Iran is in talks with the Palestinian fighters to lob some ballistic missiles at occupation forces in Gaza as well. Has anyone heard about things like that?

Infinite series (with some partial fractions) and Taylor series. It started fine but I’ll need a lot of time to understand this part.

I got lucky that my teachers so far were good and fair, and I also had a month to study after the first test, which helped a lot to drill down the pre-calculus.