Even if it wasn’t so much “manipulative”.

  • ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    When I was at a small company that worked with radioactive material, we had to register and secure all radiation sources, even the extremely weak ones that anyone can order online with no restrictions. Before the state inspector came, we deliberately left one of those weak sources out where it wasn’t supposed to be so that the inspector would find something wrong, tell us to fix it, and leave feeling like she did her job. It would be the smallest possible violation and it wouldn’t actually get us in trouble. We did that because we figured that if there was nothing obviously wrong, the inspector would look for problems a lot more carefully.

    (Nuclear physicists are rather more nonchalant about radiation than the average person is, for obvious reasons. By nuclear physicist standards, we didn’t actually have any dangerous sources at all. Thus we felt like we weren’t doing anything morally wrong, but I suppose that the average person might have disagreed.)

    • spicy pancake@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 hours ago

      meanwhile the last NRC audit at my workplace, the inspectors didn’t even use the hand and foot exit monitors on their way out. 🤦‍♀️

      I actually worried for a bit that it was a test and they were looking for someone to stop them, but nothing was on the report. smh