cm0002@lemmy.world to science@lemmy.worldEnglish · 12 days agoWe’ve had a Denisovan skull since the 1930s—only nobody knewarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square6linkfedilinkarrow-up141arrow-down10cross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.seworld@lemmy.worldworldnews@lemmy.mlnews@lemmy.worldscience@lemmy.ml
arrow-up141arrow-down1external-linkWe’ve had a Denisovan skull since the 1930s—only nobody knewarstechnica.comcm0002@lemmy.world to science@lemmy.worldEnglish · 12 days agomessage-square6linkfedilinkcross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.seworld@lemmy.worldworldnews@lemmy.mlnews@lemmy.worldscience@lemmy.ml
minus-squarejordanlund@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down2·edit-212 days ago? Article has pictures, well, looks like scans, really. Bottom one is a comparison of 2 different skulls showing we may have other Denisovan fossils and just not realize it.
minus-squarejust_another_person@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down3·12 days ago The face of a Denisovan And then proceeds to describe a face. A skull is not a face.
? Article has pictures, well, looks like scans, really.
Bottom one is a comparison of 2 different skulls showing we may have other Denisovan fossils and just not realize it.
And then proceeds to describe a face. A skull is not a face.