• jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Problem is that Gates isn’t really “in the loop” and doesn’t have especially valuable insight.

      His position in tech was always a bit removed from the core technologist work, and now his exposure is a telephone game with people that are as distant from the tech as he was.

      It is really going around with no shortage of commentators spewing out guesswork, but Gates is given more credibility by virtue of his role 30 years ago.

    • treadful@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      That’s a fair point. I just don’t know if the future they see can become a reality.

      • redballooon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        I said that a year ago, and half a year ago, too, expecting the S curve to hit and the technology to flatten out at some upper limit. But instead we got the agent loop, and models that make really good use of it, the releases only get faster and faster, and real improvements with each one, either faster and cheaper, but just as good, or actually a good deal more capable. I’m seeing signs of behavior that is more than just a good auto complete, and think there is actual intelligence.

        Even should the S curve start to turn towards slowing down now ( and it doesn’t look like it), the ceiling that it’s going towards is so high, I am with Bill Gates here. We are not prepared for what is coming.

        • treadful@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          I’m seeing signs of behavior that is more than just a good auto complete, and think there is actual intelligence.

          I suggest you be real careful not to anthropomorphize these systems. To me this sounds almost like AI psychosis.

          • protist@retrofed.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            I also don’t agree that they have any actual intelligence, but this is definitely not AI psychosis. AI psychosis is a pervasive pattern of delusional thinking and not just one thought you disagree with

            • treadful@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              I agree. That’s why I said “almost.” But AI psychosis starts with recognizing these things as sentient.

          • redballooon@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            2 days ago

            AI psychosis is what I accused by precious boss of, when he fabulated about replacing all his employees based on gpt-4o. What we have today is something completely different.

            Also, I’m not anthropomorphize these things. Intelligence is not a uniquely human quality.