Guess what? Other forms of organizing and protest will also be opposed. And we should still do them.

If a movement is real and serious that organizing to vote in primaries is really not a big deal. Blue no matter who is really just a last resort and if you don’t want to then you should at least spoil your ballot.

PS anything you consider more effective than voting can still be done btw. Change is not an all or nothing (tho given the mindset around many here they should not be surprised when they really do keep getting nothing)

  • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    Parties like PSL run candidates to advertise their platform and recruit. Considering the DNC and GOP are both pro-capitalist parties, it isn’t spoiling the ballot, it’s putting socialism on the ballot. The DSA, for all of my criticisms of them, are genuinely trying to decide whether or not to break from the democrats, and if they do they’d be far more effective. By tying workers to the DNC, or your party to the DNC, you deflate action.

    Voting is not organizing. You do not have to do anything to vote other than cast the vote. Organizing is far more than that, it involves actually materially contributing to an organization, be it party building, education, unionizing, protesting, cop watching, free breakfast programs like the Black Panthers, the clinics PTB runs in Belgium, etc. Trying to tie voting to organizing is part of the deflationary effort I mentioned, because people confuse voting for organizing and see it as a “pass.”

    Organizing takes a lot of effort, but is worthwhile.

    • InternetCitizen2@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      You do not have to do anything to vote other than cast the vote. Organizing is far more than that

      True

      Organizing takes a lot of effort, but is worthwhile.

      Also true. And from my interactions with .ml types they won’t do either. How could they if they drag their feet at something so basic, yet expect me to believe they will grab a rifle when things get heated?

      By tying workers to the DNC, or your party to the DNC, you deflate action.

      Same thing when you have that attitude around voting.

      • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        The bulk of your comment is a character attack with no actual relevance to the points brought up (nor any way to prove or disprove). The actual division is your belief that if someone does not vote, they will not act. I think that’s a more interesting topic. The biggest bloc of voting-eligible citizens is the non-voter bloc in the US, and that’s because a huge chunk of people correctly recognize that voting won’t change much.

        From the standpoint of organizing for socialism, what is to be done with this? Parties like the PSL do run candidates, but again, it’s explicitly to advertise their platform and to recruit. They don’t shame people for not voting, they appeal to the fact that many people are disaffected by capitalism and don’t see a way out.

        The DSA is struggling between a clean or dirty break with the DNC. Their entire platform, at present, is reformist, and depends on elections. They therefore do try to get people to vote, but they have a sizable wing that is revolutionary, and de facto treats it as the same way PSL does, for advertising. The big difference therefore for these socialists is the belief that the bigger tent of DSA is better than the more correct and disciplined but smaller PSL.

        The idea that there is a simplistic “voting is harm” take is a strawman. We don’t actually disagree on much, except that you seem to be intent on attacking a position that does not in reality exist. The actual position brought forward is that our efforts should be focused on organizing, not electoralism, and treating voting like it’s equal or greater in importance than organizing is a waste of effort. Not that we should waste effort in preventing people from voting, nobody does that.

        • InternetCitizen2@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          The biggest bloc of voting-eligible citizens is the non-voter bloc in the US, and that’s because a huge chunk of people correctly recognize that voting won’t change much.

          And they are also not marching in the streets.

          From the standpoint of organizing for socialism, what is to be done with this? Parties like the PSL do run candidates, but again, it’s explicitly to advertise their platform and to recruit.

          And its a good idea. Like I’ve said before, voting is still part of organizing.

          The DSA is struggling between a clean or dirty break with the DNC.

          Okay. And?

          It seems to me that you are very narrow minded about organizing and being able to do more than one thing. Is your community garden going to demolish the system? No. Its too small. Still I would not say its a waste of time. It is still a form of organizing and people taking action. Not all of us have access to one btw. Access to a ballot is still more accessible and we should vote as left as we can. If you are really that hung up on the DNC you can spoil your ballot on the general election day. Also did you know the ballot has more than just the presidential race?

          • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            3 days ago

            Correct, the people are not marching in the streets because the working class party has not yet educated, agitated, and organized at the scale necessary, and because we are not yet at a crisis point at which people naturally take to the streets, like the BLM protests were. Crisis points happen all the time, what is important is taking them from opposition to one part of the system to the system itself. That’s the job of the socialist party.

            I’m aware that you can do more than one thing. As an organizer, I know that resources are extremely limited. The point isn’t to dissuade people from voting, but to persuade people to get organized and to correctly identify capitalism as the problem, not this or that politician. That’s why the idea that I am arguing against voting is flawed, I’m against treating voting like the primary means of political change, considering it cannot actually bring the necessary change about.

            That’s my issue with this meme, the strawman it makes. You aren’t arguing against an actual position, but are framing it as though it’s the position the majority of revolutionary socialists have. We don’t actually disagree on much here.

              • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                3 days ago

                I’m aware that you see it that way, I don’t. Considering there’s no way to prove or disprove this, I tried to focus on actual political parties like the PSL and DSA, and their approach.

                • InternetCitizen2@lemmy.worldOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  Sure, but if you are disparaging to voting then its not relevant what party it is: PSL, DSA, or any other.

                  My point is that voting is still a form of organizing and disparaging it means demotivating the broader coalition. I think you have a point we won’t vote our way out of it. Still we can minimize harm. My life would be a lot better with Mamdami as my mayor. I live in Texas and a disappointing Talarico is still living to fight another day, where Paxton means assured death.

                  It is kind of a point of privileged to be able to dismiss elections and just wave them away as ineffectual. Its not a total dismantling, but taking the .ml road of don’t bother because you wont get everything is a total surrender and has serious consequences. Not all of us have the privileged to be able to ignore that.

                  • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    3 days ago

                    I’m not disparaging voting. I disagree that voting is a viable vehicle to gain necessary change, and that funneling people into that without funneling them into organizing work is ineffective. Again, you continue to rely on strawmen by pretending the revolutionary standpoint is “don’t bother because you won’t get everything,” the point is that voting cannot gain socialism. Reforms can be fought for, and should be, but the actual realm reforms are fought for is in the organizing front. Accusing me of having a “privledged” stance for actually sticking my neck out and rolling my sleeves up to do organizing work is just a provacation.