The current news has me thinking that, while the death of any human is not something I actively relish, most people feel a certain satisfaction, relief or, at least, less sad when someone like Osama Bin Laden dies, because they were responsible for the deaths of thousands of innocent people.

Which got me wondering, have studies been done estimating how many legitimate insurance cases are rejected, delayed or otherwise mishandled, and how many of those result in deaths? I guess other industries are also responsible for some pretty measurable risk factors (e.g. air pollution). It would interesting to see some rough numbers of how many deaths the CEOs who choose to continue running these companies in harmful ways account for. Obviously, they are only indirectly responsible, but the same could be said about Bin Laden, he didn’t fly the planes himself, he delegated.

  • snooggums@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 days ago

    Yeah, we can determine a floor but no upper limit.

    If I drive my wife to the hispital instead of taking an ambulance becsuse of the worry about cost and she died on the way it would be due to the industry but wouldn’t be counted against them in any statistic.

    • cranakis@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 days ago

      Or the people that don’t seek care at all because they know the care isn’t affordable. Folks with and without insurance die from treatable, non diagnosed diseases simply because they can’t afford the routine checkups that could have caught the issue in time.