• LaLuzDelSol@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    11 days ago

    I assume it would work like a perjury trial, where you have to prove they lied beyond a reasonable doubt in the court of law. So its basically like theyre always under oath.

    • evasive_chimpanzee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 days ago

      This is the only way that makes sense. Lots of people complain when a politician breaks campaign promises like:

      “I am going to lower the cost of living”.

      It’s not really a lie when they fail cause it isnt just up to them. Weaker wording like:

      “I am going to try to lower the cost of living”

      Would be technically non-falsifiable, but not actually matter to people.

      The only things that I think would actually make sense to prosecute are intentional misrepresentation of facts, or decisions that are directly in their power.

      • LaLuzDelSol@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 days ago

        Yeah I would go even further and say it shouldn’t apply to broken promises unless there is evidence they never intended to do it. Like maybe they promise “I will [reverse some policy] on day one” and then, idk the country goes to war and reversing that policy isn’t feasible. I dont think politicians should be criminally liable for that.