You raise some good points and I don’t know why you’re getting downvoted.
I think, while it’s been exaggerated, getting eaten by a wolf/coyote/dingo/bear/whatever in the woods/your sleep etc are based on things that have happened or are seen at least as a possibility.
I feel the same can’t be said about people’s interpretations of the contents of one book, edited many times over the centuries to suit whichever rulers agenda, and based on ideals from the late Stone Age to be any basis for modern life.
I support religious freedom for adults when it’s their own choice. I can’t support it when it’s inflicted on impressionable minds when the alternatives aren’t discussed.
You raise some good points and I don’t know why you’re getting downvoted.
I think, while it’s been exaggerated, getting eaten by a wolf/coyote/dingo/bear/whatever in the woods/your sleep etc are based on things that have happened or are seen at least as a possibility.
I feel the same can’t be said about people’s interpretations of the contents of one book, edited many times over the centuries to suit whichever rulers agenda, and based on ideals from the late Stone Age to be any basis for modern life.
I support religious freedom for adults when it’s their own choice. I can’t support it when it’s inflicted on impressionable minds when the alternatives aren’t discussed.