• Natanael@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      18 days ago

      It’s quite another thing when you’re paying a ton more fees on imports, paying more for less in industries where foreign workers stopped coming, etc.

      • deHaga@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        18 days ago

        Not really. Our economy is 80% services. High margin, high value, and low carbon.

        • Natanael@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          18 days ago

          And suffocating your exports as a part of it. Your leadership is obsessed with natural gas, pretending it’s cheaper than renewables (blatantly false). Your national security laws are unhinged enough to threaten export of IT related services due to the jurisdiction. Your creative industry can’t reach into EU as easily anymore, many artists don’t tour internationally anymore.

          https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cyv0m164m84o

          The numbers range from about 3% to 8%. “The fact that it is harder to trade with the EU is about half the hit, in line with previous forecasts,” says lead author of the NBER research, Nick Bloom.

          He attributes the rest to the consequences of what at times felt like near-nightly political meltdown during the Brexit negotiations. "The other half is the uncertainty from the fact the Brexit process itself was such an enormous mess… We can never get that second 4% back

          https://www.nber.org/papers/w34459

          We estimate that investment was reduced by 12% to 13%, employment by 3% to 4% and productivity by 3% to 4%. These negative impacts reflect a combination of elevated uncertainty, reduced demand, diverted management time, and increased misallocation of resources from a protracted Brexit process

          https://consoc.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/The-Economic-Impact-of-Brexit.pdf

          Considering all of the evidence, the consensus view – that Brexit’s economic impact would be negative and large – has been borne out. The 2019-2024 parliament raised taxes by around £100 billion, and if we take the OBR’s 4 per cent loss of productivity to be the true figure, £40 billion of those tax rises were needed because of EU withdrawal.

          https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/economics/news/2026/6/new_research_maps_the_regional_cost_of_brexit_uk_levelled_down_not_levelled_up/

          • deHaga@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            18 days ago

            Using a synthetic control approach, the researchers compare each UK area’s actual economic path with a data-driven counterfactual: how that area might have evolved had Brexit not happened.

            Synthetic counter factuals. Bullshit

            • Natanael@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              18 days ago

              Comparing growth rates and showing UK fell behind is perfectly valid and you’re still ignoring the imposed costs and proof of harmed industries

              • deHaga@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                17 days ago

                It would be perfectly valid if they used the actual data and not synthetic counter factuals.

                And it’s the net that matters, dirty goods trade has been replaced with clean services.