Sundray@lemmus.org to Not The Onion@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 个月前Microsoft executive vice president bemoans employees sending him "AI slop," saying "This is a doom loop."www.windowscentral.comexternal-linkmessage-square97linkfedilinkarrow-up1539arrow-down13cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.worldfuck_ai@lemmy.world
arrow-up1536arrow-down1external-linkMicrosoft executive vice president bemoans employees sending him "AI slop," saying "This is a doom loop."www.windowscentral.comSundray@lemmus.org to Not The Onion@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 个月前message-square97linkfedilinkcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.worldfuck_ai@lemmy.world
minus-squareFishFace@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·2 个月前Heuristics are by definition imperfect, but they are not, generally, “just good enough”. In fact, heuristics may not be good enough for a given purpose. Am I right that you’re not actually disagreeing with my comment?
minus-squareatomicbocks@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 个月前Heuristics that aren’t good enough aren’t used for that purpose… what kind of rebuttal is this even?
minus-squareFishFace@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 个月前It’s not a rebuttal because I don’t even know what point you’re trying to make, as you may have been able to tell from my question: Am I right that you’re not actually disagreeing with my comment?
Heuristics are by definition imperfect, but they are not, generally, “just good enough”. In fact, heuristics may not be good enough for a given purpose.
Am I right that you’re not actually disagreeing with my comment?
Heuristics that aren’t good enough aren’t used for that purpose… what kind of rebuttal is this even?
It’s not a rebuttal because I don’t even know what point you’re trying to make, as you may have been able to tell from my question: