• WoodScientist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    Seriously. My partner and I are millionaires. We’re almost 40 and have a net worth just shy of $2M. We’ve a couple of DINKS. We’re both engineers, are pretty good with numbers, and understand compound interest. We got on the property ladder pretty early. I bought my first townhouse in 2012 pretty much right at the bottom of the housing market. We’ve moved twice since then and have benefited from the full rise in house prices.

    Our net worth is a little under $2M. About $10k of that is checking and savings. Another $80k in a taxable brokerage account as an emergency fund. $450k in home equity. The rest is in retirement accounts such as 401ks and IRAs.

    We are working class. The closest either of us have ever come to hiring someone is when we’ve hired a plumber or electrician to fix something at our home. I’ve technically owned a business, but just for my own freelance tutoring work. And the closest either of us have ever come to being a landlord was when I had a couple of roommates at that first townhouse I bought.

    We’re doing very well; we have no complaints. And while we’ve achieved some modest amount of wealth, it’s not ultimately about living large or in luxury. We live well below our means. We recently bought our first new car in many years, a new Toyota Corolla. It replaced a 15 year old Corolla that my partner bought new. We buy affordable reliable vehicles and drive them til the wheels fall off. I still get most of my clothes at thrift stores. We have a house worth over $600k, but our mortgage payment is just $2k, and that’s on a 15-year note. A few years ago when I was in grad school, I was literally a millionaire who road the bus.

    But again, we’re not trying to get rich for the sake of getting rich. We don’t want to own some huge company and lord over a room full of workers. We’re not trying to hoard the largest possible amount of money we can. We don’t view wealth as a lifetime high score. It’s simply a means to achieve stability and safety. We’re on the path to early retirement. We hope to retire by the time we’re 50. We need to save up a couple of million not because we want to live in luxury, but simply because it’s the only way to have a decent stable and safe retirement in this capitalist hellscape we live in. In a world with universal healthcare and a universal basic income, we would have no need for millions in retirement savings. If my partner and I each brought in say, $20k a year from UBI? If we had a paid off house and also didn’t have to worry about healthcare? We could live quite well off just that $40k per year.

    I’m a millionaire and I support much higher taxes on millionaires. I do this because ultimately the point for us for having a couple of million is not to have a couple of million. The point is to have safety and stability in our lives. And the more secure the social safety net, the less the need to cover those needs privately.

    • حمید پیام عباسی@crazypeople.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      29
      ·
      6 days ago

      You may not be rich by the common understand of the term and life style but you are not working class, you are part of the middle class unlike many Americans who say they are. It is a petit bourgeois class. If you have a net worth of almost 2 million dollars you own capital assets and by definition are not part of the working class.

      • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        31
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Petit bourgeois? Our money is all in our house and in retirement assets that are just America’s poor excuse for a pension system. If we’re petit bourgeois, so is every retired school teacher that’s worked long enough to earn a pension.

        Petit bourgeois refers to people that have to work but also control their own means of production. Classically this meant artisans, tradesmen, shop owners, etc. People who aren’t having their labor exploited, but also still have to work.

        In our careers, we’ve almost always worked regular salary jobs. We’re not immune to job loss. We do not own the means of production. We’ve had our labor surplus siphoned off by employers our whole careers.

        That’s the whole point of this discussion. Even most millionaires are just working class people trying to achieve a little bit of stability in their lives.

        • حمید پیام عباسی@crazypeople.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          15
          ·
          6 days ago

          Owning the means of production is the capitalist and bourgeois class of which you are below and do the functional work for, the petit bourgeois are professionals like yourself. .8% of the world has a net worth over a million dollars and only around 2.5% of Americans have over a million in retirement accounts. You are quite literally in the global 1%

          • amorpheus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            6 days ago

            You are quite literally in the global 1%

            That’s true for a lot of people in “first world” countries. One is ahead of billions of poor people basically for existing.

            • حمید پیام عباسی@crazypeople.online
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              5 days ago

              Yeah, and none of them are in the working class. That wealth represents a direct transfer of wealth from where I live to the imperial core. You are all liberal petty bourgeois and you are not going to be allies in the revolution, you are going to side with your capitalists when you realize that breaking that transfer is going to be against your material interests.

          • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            6 days ago

            You can have whatever definition you want. But for me, working class means just that - a person that has earned their bread through the work of their own hands, not through the exploitation of the labor of others, through rent-seeking, or from inheritance.

            I’m sure you can cite plenty of theory, but frankly, I don’t care. I prefer a definition of the term centered in lived experience. If you go off raw wealth, you just end up classifying entire nations as working class or bourgeois, at which point the term loses all meaning.

            • حمید پیام عباسی@crazypeople.online
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              5 days ago

              Ok, except your wealth comes from a transfer of wealth from the labor and resources from where I live. Your wealth is based on the super exploitation of the rest of the world. You are enemies of the global working class and you’re not going to ever be revolutionary or do anything to change where you live because your material conditions are dependent on your empires continued exploitation of the rest of the world. At best people who live in the imperial core will use labor organization to secure themselves better welfare under the system you live in, you’re incapable of changing it because you are the perpetrators of it and your material conditions are dependent on it. This is why Americans are useless babies and why you live in a country that is run by someone like Donald Trump, he perfectly represents you. This is why “tankies” support literally any country that fights you, because you are the actual global villains in your banal servitude to the empire.

              • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                4 days ago

                Oh, you’re just a racist garbage person. Xenophobia does not become OK simply because the target are Americans.

                Well, if I guess if I’m irredeemably evil simply because of where I happened to be born, then you have no room to complain. I’m just doing what I was born to do, apparently. I’ll disregard your words, because they’re irrelevant to an evil monster like myself.

                • حمید پیام عباسی@crazypeople.online
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 days ago

                  Boohoo the multi-millionaire equity holding property owner in the country that is murdering little girls in the country I come from and threatening to invade the country I live in thinks I’m xenophobic, oh noooooo.

                  All your wealth was stolen and you’re part of an imperial machine that is no different than the Nazis. I already know you’re racist garbage person, because you are American. You’re not working class, you are exploiting the working classes wealth and hording it in your retirement account. If there was a revolution, you would turn your back on it as soon as the empire gave you more crumbs. You’d drop the rest of the world in a second when they dangle medicare for all there. Racist loser Americans have done that every. single. time.

                  The burden isn’t on me to accept you richy rich, the burden is on you to actually do something about the shithole you live in.

          • AppleTea@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            6 days ago

            You are saying that capitalists own the means of production, while “little capitalists” don’t.

            I don’t think its useful to lump in high-income professional work with the low end of capital accumulation. The sums may overlap, but the actual class interests don’t, at least not entirely. Good analysis should recognize the distinctions here.

            • حمید پیام عباسی@crazypeople.online
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              10
              ·
              6 days ago

              The PMC is part of the petit bourgeois in modern society. White Americans are for the most part not part of the working class or global proliteriat since their material conditions are based on the exploitation of the labor from where I live. Read Settlers