It is widely accepted that there is an AI bubble in the financial markets at the moment. The moderate opinion is however that LLMs are constantly improving and will eventually take over more and more tasks from humans and increase productivity. But are LLMs actually getting smarter, or just better at fooling us?\n
The people who use AI and dont even look what it does. The only explanation for experts using it and this divide growing is they aren’t watching what it does. They’re just letting it do their job for them and not thinking.
So these mythical workers are pushing slop all day every day without reading their output, the entire time AI has existed… and they’re still gainfully employed? And getting promoted?
How is that possible that a worker is producing absolute verifiable garbage, but is still viewed as a valuable member of the team by their peers and supervisors?
Did you read the fucken article? A divide does not mean that they are producing straight garbage, it means that the code quality is lessening, not that it immediately became a mess that won’t even compile. Which in my opinion means nobody gives a fuck about their desk jobs and they still collect a check whether the AI spits out the code or they do.
I’m not talking to an article, I’m talking to you. And you said:
I disagree with your assertion
Well apparently I am talking to a fucking brickwall
Attacking the person and not the point is probably supporting your argument, somehow
You came in down voting and sealioning with this
There is no point here but your hatred towards AI. Thats valid, but you are just lashing out.