I was going to comment on a post today, and found out I’d been banned from mop@quokk.au. Apparently it happened awhile ago.

Not much of a reason, no real evidence given. The mod didn’t include a screenshot, link, or even quoted text, so I’m not sure which specific interaction led to this. Basically this is just thought policing. Hilarious considering that the community claims to be:

free of the “ML” influence of instances like lemmy.ml and lemmygrad.

Also, even if the accusation is true it doesn’t break any community rules:

There is only one mod of mop@quokk.au, so this isn’t just a vague/general example. @lumpenproletariat@quokk.au is a PTB.

  • Commiunism@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I remember commenting quite a bit on that community, though mostly because it consistently posted coal that didn’t make sense but had lots of upvotes regardless. The main mod then proceeded to look for any excuse to ban me off the platform and essentially admitted that they’re building an echo chamber and don’t like any dissenting voices even when it’s coming from the rare anti-liberal position they allegedly agree with.

    You’ve probably been done a favor with this tbh, stay away and let kids have their fun

  • FashyFungusCunt@futurology.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    PTB. Fake anarchist communities are the worst. They claim they want freedom and to have no rules but they rule with an iron fist.

  • alapakala@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    What was the comment you wanted to publish?
    I can intersect it for you, if think it’s relevant agitprop.

    • NaibofTabr@infosec.pubOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      I appreciate the offer, but I’m not really interested in attempting to dodge a ban for the sake of a comment on a meme post. It was just the catalyst for this.

      • alapakala@quokk.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        23 hours ago

        You wouldn’t be dodging a ban since I’d be commenting on your behalf. Unless you think the ban is deserved?

        • NaibofTabr@infosec.pubOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Unless you think the ban is deserved?

          I think the ban is the ban, and that my conduct is and will continue to be more mature than these PTBs.

    • NaibofTabr@infosec.pubOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      For what reason, exactly?

      An accusation was made in the ban, but nothing was provided to substantiate it. What you seem to be saying is that the accusation itself is enough to justify the ban, which is akin to a witch hunt, where the accused is presumed to be guilty and is then punished for having been accused, with no evidence given and no recourse.

      I was not given the basic courtesy of a warning, or even a message from the moderator, and a 73-year ban is effectively permanent, which is extreme when no actual rules were broken. Basically, I was banned for thought crime, because the mod didn’t like what I said. The judgment was carried out summarily and with no consideration. This is kangeroo court nonsense.

      The last time I experienced similar behavior was on lemmygrad.ml.

      • NaibofTabr@infosec.pubOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Yikes. So what you’re saying is that a difference in political opinion is justification for retaliatory action. That is fantastically authoritarian.

        What exactly was “shitty” about any of those comments?

        • Unruffled [they/them]@lemmy.dbzer0.comM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Why do you have a problem with anarchists banning you from anarchist communities exactly? Do you think you should be able to say what you like wherever you go? Quokk.au isn’t a freeze peach instance. They have no obligation to let you visit and shit on the floor.

          • NaibofTabr@infosec.pubOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            16 hours ago

            Why do you have a problem with anarchists banning you from anarchist communities exactly? Do you think you should be able to say what you like wherever you go?

            I think that I haven’t broken any rules, and that I’ve essentially been judged under some secret law, and the punitive measure was delivered effectively in secret with no communication or recourse, which is the kind of behavior one expects from fascists and authoritarians.

            Basically I think I’m the victim of abject hypocrites. People who claim to be ideologically against abuses of authority obviously approve of such abuses when aligned with their personal politics.

            It’s very telling to me that so many people here are functionally behaving as if the mod were right because they’re the mod, which is to say “might makes right”.

            Quokk.au isn’t a freeze peach instance. They have no obligation to let you visit and shit on the floor.

            I think that if you’re going to build an echo chamber, you should have explicit rules identifying it as such, to the effect of “Only approved ideologies are allowed to be expressed here, and all others are forbidden.” That way you at least have to consciously process that you are building an echo chamber, and you put up a warning sign so that reasonable, cooperative and tolerant people will know to stay away.

            • Luminous5481 "Enemy of the State"@anarchist.nexus
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 hours ago

              Basically I think I’m the victim of abject hypocrites.

              no you’re not. one of the most important foundations of anarchism is the concept of freedom of association. we have decided we no longer wish to associate with you. your own personal freedoms have not been affected by this decision.

  • tidderuuf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    Fine example of Lemmy turning into federated silos and echo chambers just like their ancestors sailed from on Reddit.

      • NaibofTabr@infosec.pubOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        In a vacuum, an idealistic world in which everyone is acting in good faith, this seems like a good idea.

        In practice, any unmoderated internet space that allows arbitrary user content quickly becomes overrun with adbots, to the point that the platform is unusable for everyone else. Leaving it up to the individual to block them just becomes an exponentially growing game of whac-a-mole.

        • FashyFungusCunt@futurology.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Allow people to create lists then just like adblock. It still needs to be up to people if they want to or don’t want to see people, spam or not!

          • NaibofTabr@infosec.pubOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            You would spend all of your time just blocking bots. Even if you personally would not be turned away by that, most people would, so the platform would be effectively empty.