Not sure if a poorly conducted study, or just a poorly written one side of the dodgy duopoly fanboy article.
I don’t doubt that burning gas is a health hazard in the home, but a longer term, larger based study seems like something that should have happened years ago.
It’s a terrible study. They specifically waited to measure until the study participants were in a flare, and then changed the the stoves out and… gasp a disease that is notoriously flare-y got better
Not sure if a poorly conducted study, or just a poorly written one side of the dodgy duopoly fanboy article.
I don’t doubt that burning gas is a health hazard in the home, but a longer term, larger based study seems like something that should have happened years ago.
It’s a terrible study. They specifically waited to measure until the study participants were in a flare, and then changed the the stoves out and… gasp a disease that is notoriously flare-y got better
Links to older studies are literally in the first line of the article.
links to a site covered in amazon ads…
I used to smoke, it didn’t take me 200 years to work out it was bad for me.
What do you know about history of tabacco and smoking?
If you have a spare 200 years, take a seat and listen to my story.
Nah, I think that you wasted enough of my time with your bullshit xD
Your brain was struggling a long time before I even started smoking.