• gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    13 days ago

    So you’re going to store nuclear waste above ground for a couple of millennia?

    Literally yes, it’s not just left out in the open air, they’re stored in specialized containers that use inert gas and concrete to block the radiation from getting out. They can also then be buried beneath the ground for extra protection

    And thorium reactors might some day become a viable technology. But that is at best decades away.

    It is most certainly not decades away at best unless fear mongering managed to slow research more than it already has done, but that’s not an issue with the technology at all

    And what about all those old and aging legacy reactors that are being kept running beyond their design lifespan? Surely nothing can go wrong there.

    You update them, which is how they’re operating beyond their initial designed lifespan. Current idea in the field is to replace aging uranium reactors with molten thorium as they’re apparently pretty simple to convert over

    To quote you on this topic:

    you just show how little you understand the subject matter

    • Chewy@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      13 days ago

      You’re telling me humanity will able to manage nuclear waste for hundreds to thousands of years, given the fall of multiple great societies over the last few thousand years?

      It’s not even a solved problem how to communicate danger with signs[1], and you think knowledge about where nuclear waste is being stored will be preserved for a thousand years?

      I really envy you for your optimism in humanity.

      [1] https://youtu.be/lOEqzt36JEM

      • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        13 days ago

        You’re telling me humanity will able to manage nuclear waste for hundreds to thousands of years

        You put it in a hole, done. Humanity is capable of that, for sure

        It’s not even a solved problem how to communicate danger with signs

        We won’t ever know if it is/can be, due to not ever knowing what future societiesoght perceive. We’re doing our best, and can rightfully assume even a fully wiped humanity will learn to stay away from things with our warning symbols on them after a few die from radiation, if that even occurs

        You can also pour shit tons of concrete and other stuff around it to make it clear even without signs that something you do not want is in here

        • Chewy@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          13 days ago

          You put it in a hole, done. Humanity is capable of that, for sure

          Looking at the discussion where this hole should be doesn’t give me confidence. Everyone wants long term storage, but no one wants it near themselves.

          We’re producing nuclear waste for half a century and there’s still no long term storage location. The generation who created this early waste is currently dying away and I don’t think the generation after wants to deal with the problem either.

          • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            13 days ago

            Everyone wants long term storage, but no one wants it near themselves.

            Because of fear mongering, it is not dangerous to stick it in a hole and be done with it

            The generation who created this early waste is currently dying away and I don’t think the generation after wants to deal with the problem either

            Its not a problem