bigboismith@lemmy.world to MeanwhileOnGrad@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 7 months agoNATO apologismlemmy.worldimagemessage-square4fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up11arrow-down1imageNATO apologismlemmy.worldbigboismith@lemmy.world to MeanwhileOnGrad@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 7 months agomessage-square4fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareHonytawk@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·7 months agoI’d be glad if NATO didn’t exist. It would mean countries wouldn’t feel threatened by their neighbors, and no invasions would happen. But until that is the case, NATO is necessary.
minus-squarecalcopiritus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·7 months agoI would much prefer every country in the planet being in NATO. Any country attacks any other country? Literally the whole world goes to defend it. So no invasions are possible. It wouldn’t work though. Wouldn’t take much time for alliances to form that agree to not follow NATO’S rules.
minus-squarearchomrade [he/him]@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0arrow-down1·7 months agoNato already does not enforce their mission against the US and US backed vassel states
I’d be glad if NATO didn’t exist.
It would mean countries wouldn’t feel threatened by their neighbors, and no invasions would happen.
But until that is the case, NATO is necessary.
I would much prefer every country in the planet being in NATO.
Any country attacks any other country? Literally the whole world goes to defend it. So no invasions are possible.
It wouldn’t work though. Wouldn’t take much time for alliances to form that agree to not follow NATO’S rules.
Nato already does not enforce their mission against the US and US backed vassel states