Video link-> https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/2027629660373184512/vid/avc1/1280x692/zuo2E5i9QORH5h1Z.mp4

Source -> https://xcancel.com/RapidReport2025/status/2027629748394873333#m

Confirmed Israel attacked Iran

💠Israeli Defense Minister, Israel Katz, announced that the Israeli government has carried out a preemptive strike against Iran “to eliminate threats against the State of Israel.”

Katz declared a special state of emergency across the country and warned that missile and drone attacks against Israel and its civilian population are expected soon.

Instructions from the Home Front Command must be followed, and people should remain in protected locations.

sepahnews.ir (http://sepahnews.ir/) | Sepah News

https://t.me/sepahnewsir403/10354

  • nathanboleshevik@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 month ago

    This is potentially the biggest Iran story nobody is talking about: the global insurance market may be heading toward a systemic crisis. Here’s why…

    Most people don’t realize London isn’t just a financial center it’s THE center of global insurance.

    Lloyd’s underwrites ~40% of the world’s marine cargo. Ship sinks, port gets bombed, canal gets blocked the bill lands in London.

    This is why the UK punches above its weight. Not the Royal Navy. Not diplomacy. Insurance.

    Control insurance, control trade.

    And London doesn’t just control the 90% of global trade that moves by sea. Lloyd’s and the London market are major insurers of almost everything skyscrapers, factories, ports, satellites, entire supply chains.

    You can’t participate in public markets or raise large amounts of capital without insurance.

    Now, the normal playbook for war risk is repricing, not cancellation.

    Canceling coverage entirely is a massive escalation in underwriting posture. It signals something beyond risk, it signals uncertainty so deep the underwriter can’t even price it.

    The question everyone should be asking: why?

    Why not just jack up premiums and make a fortune off the crisis like they did in the Black Sea off Ukraine?

    To answer that, you have to understand WHY London has maintained a stranglehold on global insurance while losing nearly submarket related to ships.

    The answer: better intelligence.

    It is no coincidence that MI6 headquarters sits directly across the Thames from the IMOHQ, the world’s maritime regulator & a short distance from Lloyd’s itself.

    I have no proof of a direct pipeline, but it has long been speculated in the industry that intelligence flows from MI6 to Lloyd’s.

    Having the best intel in the world would be the single greatest competitive advantage any insurer could possess: the ability to price risk that competitors can only guess at.

    Here’s the problem: the majority of MI6’s intel doesn’t come from its own agents. It comes from Five Eyes the alliance comprising the US, UK, Australia, Canada, and New Zealand.

    And within 5Eyes, the dominant partner is obvious. The CIA, NSA, NRO, etc generate the lion’s share of intel.

    So if Lloyd’s pricing advantage flows from MI6, and MI6’s best intelligence flows from the US… what happens when that data pipeline gets throttled?

    All indications are that Keir Starmer was blindsided by the size and scope of the US/Israel strikes on Iran this weekend. That alone tells you something about the current state of transatlantic intelligence sharing.

    And we know there has been serious anger in Washington over the UK’s decision to sell Diego Garcia, home to America’s most strategically important base in the Indian Ocean, to Mauritius.

    It is not a huge leap to conclude that the submarine cables linking Langley to London have gone dark, or at minimum have been significantly throttled.

    What this means for UK national security is a question for the Brits. But what it means for EVERY company globally that’s insured through the London market has massive implications for the entire financial system.

    Because most large insurers worldwide don’t do independent intelligence work. They index off Lloyd’s rates.

    If you’re insuring a skyscraper in Tokyo, a semiconductor fab in Taiwan, or a port in Argentina you get a Lloyd’s quote, then shop that price around.

    Other insurers see Lloyd’s number and assume the diligence was done. They price accordingly.

    This means if London is suddenly flying blind it’s not just Lloyd’s policyholders at risk. It’s the entire global reinsurance chain.

    The cancellation of war risk coverage on ships isn’t the crisis. It’s the canary.

    If this hypothesis is correct, we could be looking at a systemic repricing event across global insurance markets…. the kind of cascading uncertainty that defined 2008 and COVID.

    Watch Lloyd’s. Watch reinsurance spreads. What Five Eyes. That’s where this story, and possibly Wall Street, breaks.

    • John Konrad who runs the marine shipping website Gcaptain

    @Slavyangrad

    Source ->https://t.me/Slavyangrad/156987

    • Sodium_nitride@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 month ago

      I just learned what reinsurance is and the concept sounds insane. The insurance company hands off its risk to another company? Then what is the point of the insurance company? Leeching middleman?

    • KrasnaiaZvezda@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 month ago

      That’s an interesting point to consider.

      The other one that I was considering, although concentrated only in the middle east, is that China is likely to increase the risk assessement of the countries in the region, somewhat like they did with the colonist entity cutting (private?) investments there. And if that happens the gulf monarchies might lose a lot of the cash they got in the next years too, as western investment will go back to the core and to the colonists, if they survive…

    • p0ntyp00l@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Damn I never even thought of that. As if I needed another reason to want to push every insurance industry person into a volcano.
      (the ad industry guys can also walk the plank)