• Eggymatrix@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 month ago

      Same could be said with people hyping something.

      This tech might be good for tripping on shrooms, but as with other applications it is being forced on, lacks the planning and stability to be useful yet.

      One year is overéy optimistic. Maybe 5 - 10.

      • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        The rate of improvement every few months has been absolutely incredible. Given we already have open source stuff like this, 5-10 years seems rather pessimistic. But even that isn’t really that long of a time frame in the grand scheme of things.

        • msage@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          I mean, it’s not?

          Demos of marginal improvements pale in comparison of the real missing pieces.

          I’ll keep saying it: we need new designes of models, not billions of investment into the current ones.