• DynamoSunshirtSandals@possumpat.io
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    19 days ago

    I do exactly this as well. Works great! Dynamic DNS is kind of a hilarious hack.

    Quick question: since I use wireguard, do I need to use DNS-over-HTTPS for security? My assumption is that my entire session is already encrypted with my wireguard keys, so it doesn’t matter. But I figured I should double check.

    • Lem453@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      19 days ago

      You do not need anything else. DNS requests are all sent over Wireguard with encryption

      • DynamoSunshirtSandals@possumpat.io
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        19 days ago

        Excellent to have confirmation, thanks. What about the VPN connection handshake? I always assumed it was OK over non-SSL, because the exchange should use signed keys. But that is quite an assumption on my part.

        • Lem453@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          19 days ago

          Wireguard uses public and private keys which are designed from the ground up to be used over plain text to establish the handshake so it isn’t an issue. Same idea with ssh keys and ssl keys

    • mac@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      19 days ago

      Depends, do you have pihole/unbound setup to only recursively resolve? Or do you forward requests to an upstream (either as a fallback or just as a primary). If that’s the case, and depending on your threat model, you’ll want to set up DoH or DoT as your DNS requests will be forwarded in plaintext