https://xcancel.com/caitoz/status/1982598726591140234 (https://x.com/caitoz/status/1982598726591140234)

1000010902
1000010903
1000010904
1000010906
1000010905
Etc.

The obvious solution is to forbid medias to be bought by the wealthy, giving them to their journalists. And to also increase the pluralism instead of aiming for a uniformity/pseudo-objectivity/‘chase of the militant medias’.
The problem isn’t the existence of far-right medias, but that they’re disproportionately supported by the anti-communists/wealthy, and that there’s almost no anti-imperialist/communist media in comparison.
At least in my opinion.

As an example to continue C.Johnstone’s enumeration, many people oppose communism because they love freedom, how stupid is that.
And atrocity propaganda is unfortunately here to stay.

They see a tyranny to bring down, while i see a population opressed(, from the start,) for their political/economic ideals : https://t.me/MFARussia/27001

My point would be that no western media will ever defend the DPRK, and that lack of pluralism is considered normal. How easy it is to win a debate if only one side can speak.