That’s true if you only interpret constitution as “codified constitution”, certainly.
But the point is still true if you replace “constitutional restrictions on doing so” with “constitutional conventions against doing so” or even simply “a history of protecting citizens against it”, so I’m not sure what you’re ultimately trying to argue here.
The context you took issue with was:
While I’m not enthusiastic about the idea of stripping citizenship as a general principle […] the UK doesn’t have constitutional restrictions on doing so the way the US does.
That’s true if you only interpret constitution as “codified constitution”, certainly.
But the point is still true if you replace “constitutional restrictions on doing so” with “constitutional conventions against doing so” or even simply “a history of protecting citizens against it”, so I’m not sure what you’re ultimately trying to argue here.
The context you took issue with was:
Read again and have a think. Without deluding yourself, ideally.
👍