• Fizz@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    These glasses are actually insanely cool. I’d pay so much for an open source pair and the band.

    It sucks that no matter what cool new hardware meta comes out with will always be ruined by them stuffing in “meta integration”.

    • QuadratureSurfer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      Seriously, an open source version would be awesome. You could connect it to your own server running whatever local models you want without needing to worry about that audio/video being processed by some large corporation willing to sell you out along with your data.

  • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    6 months ago

    I can think of one useful function. I have a lot of friends who are totally blind, and there’s an app called Be My Eyes, where a sighted person can take a look at something through your phone’s camera. But, being blind, a lot of blind people are absolutely terrible at aiming cameras, because they can’t see what they’re aiming at.

    In this case, the object ends up out of the camera’s field of view, or at an angle, or upside down, etc. etc. etc. Whereas, I think having a pair of smart glasses on your face would make the camera platform be much steadier.

  • Zak@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 months ago

    Smart glasses also raise many privacy concerns, as their cameras and microphones may be recording at any given time, which can be unnerving to people.

    This reaction has always struck me as, at best ill-informed. If I search for spy camera glasses on Amazon, I can find much cheaper and less obvious options to record people without their knowledge. If glasses are getting extra scrutiny lately, maybe I’d be better off with a spy camera pen or something like this which can be disguised as part of a button-up shirt.

    Of course actually using any of these to record people without their consent in most situations makes you an asshole, but that capability already existed and is continually expanding.

    • JustTesting@lemmy.hogru.ch
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      sure, but there the spying is the purpose, whereas with the glasses it’s incidental.

      you don’t buy such gadgets if you don’t intend to spy, but people would buy meta glasses for other reason, and meta being able to spy on you is just a side-effect. Plus it’ a matter of scale, this has the potential of being much more prominent than some spy camera.

      • Zak@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Meta spying is its own issue, and I think a very legitimate concern.

        I’m understanding the concern the article mentions about smart glasses in general (independent of who manufactures them) being the user recording people. That’s what people seemed to be upset about when Google Glass launched as well.

  • Chaotic Entropy@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Cool… now everyone can be a part of their respective surveillance states. While Meta makes a buck on selling your feed to governments and law enforcement.

  • FaceDeer@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Ah, yet another bit of technology I’ve been looking forward to for years.

    Let’s see @technology dump all over it.

  • artifex@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    I love this image. I think it should be required on any smartglasses packaging like the surgeon general’s warning is on a pack of cigarettes (for now).