• rumba@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 hours ago

    7th gen intel, 96GB mismatched ram, 4 used 10TB HDD, one 12 with a broken sata connector that only works because it’s sitting just right in a sled. A couple of 14’s one M.2 and two sataSSD. It’s running Unraid with 2 VM’s (plex and Home Assistant), one of which has corrupted itself 3 times. A 1080 and a 2070.

    I can get several streams off it at once, but not while it’s running parity check and it can’t handle 4k transcoding.

    It’s not horrible, but I couldn’t do what I do now with less :)

  • TMP_NKcYUEoM7kXg4qYe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I used to selfhost on a core 2 duo thinkpad R60i. It had a broken fan so I had to hide it into a storage room otherwise it would wake up people from sleep during the night making weird noises. It was pretty damn slow. Even opening proxmox UI in the remotely took time. KrISS feed worked pretty well tho.

    I have since upgraded to… well, nothing. The fan is KO now and the laptop won’t boot. It’s a shame because not having access to radicale is making my life more difficult than it should be. I use CalDAV from disroot.org but it would be nice to share a calendar with my family too.

  • GaMEChld@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Plex server is running on my old Threadripper 1950X. Thing has been a champ. Due to rebuild it since I’ve got newer hardware to cycle into it but been dragging my heels on it. Not looking forward to it.

    • potustheplant@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Isn’t ryzen not recommended for transcoding? Plus, I’ve read that power efficiency isn’t great. Mostly regarding idle power consumption.

      • TMP_NKcYUEoM7kXg4qYe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Ryzen is not recommended for transcoding because the Radeon integrated GPU’s encoding accelerator is not as fast as in intel iGPUs. But this does not come into play if you A) have 16 cores and B) don’t even have an integrated GPU.

        And about idle power consumption: I don’t think it’s a point of interest if you are using a workstation class computer.

        • potustheplant@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I think it’s a point of a interest for any hw running 24/7 but you do you.

          Regarding transcoding, are you saying you’re not even doing it? If you are, doing it with your cpu is far more inefficient than using a gpu. But again, different strokes I guess.

          • TMP_NKcYUEoM7kXg4qYe@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            3 hours ago

            Dunno whether they are transcoding or not nor why they have such a bizarre setup. But I would hope 16C/32T CPU from 2017 could handle software transcoding. Also peak power consumption while playing a movie does not really matter compared to idle power consumption. What matters more is that the motherboard is probably packed with pcie slots that consume a lot of power. But to OP it probably does not matter if they use a threadripper.

  • evidences@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 hours ago

    My NAS is on an embedded Xeon that at this point is close to a decade old and one of my proxmox boxes is on an Intel 6500t. I’m not really running anything on any really low spec machines anymore, though earlyish in the pandemic I was running boinc with the Open Pandemics project on 4 raspberry pis.

  • Deway@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 hours ago

    My first @home server was an old defective iMac G3 but it did the job (and then died for good) A while back, I got a RP3 and then a small thin client with some small AMD CPU. They (barely) got the job done.

    I replaced them with an HP EliteDesk G2 micro with a i5-6500T. I don’t know what to do with the extra power.

      • Deway@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Prosody (XMPP server), a git instance, a searXNG instance, Tandoor (recipe manager), Next Cloud, Syncthing for my phone and my partner’s (one could say Next Cloud should be enough but I use it for different purposes), and a few other stuff.

        It doesn’t even use an eight of its total RAM and I’ve never seen the CPU go past 20℅. But it uses a lot less power than the thin client it replaced so not a bad investment, especially considering its price.

  • sudoer777@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    I started my self hosting journey on a Dell all-in-one PC with 4 GB RAM, 500 GB hard drive, and Intel Pentium, running Proxmox, Nextcloud, and I think Home Assistant. I upgraded it eventually, now I’m on a build with Ryzen 3600, 32 GB RAM, 2 TB SSD, and 4x4 TB HDD

    • tburkhol@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 hours ago

      My first server was a single-core Pentium - maybe even 486 - desktop I got from university surplus. That started a train of upgrading my server to the old desktop every 5-or-so years, which meant the server was typically 5-10 years old. The last system was pretty power-hungry, though, so the latest upgrade was an N100/16 GB/120 GB system SSD.

      I have hopes that the N100 will last 10 years, but I’m at the point where it wouldn’t be awful to add a low-cost, low-power computer to my tech upgrade cycle. Old hardware is definitely a great way to start a self-hosting journey.

  • sith@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Maybe a more reasonable question: Is there anyone here self-hosting on non-shit hardware? 😅

  • Rooty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    Enterprise level hardware costs a lot, is noisy and needs a dedicated server room, old laptops cost nothing.

    • pixelscript@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      I got a 1U rack server for free from a local business that was upgrading their entire fleet. Would’ve been e-waste otherwise, so they were happy to dump it off on me. I was excited to experiment with it.

      Until I got it home and found out it was as loud as a vacuum cleaner with all those fans. Oh, god no…

      I was living with my parents at the time, and they had a basement I could stick it in where its noise pollution was minimal. I mounted it up to a LackRack.

      Since moving out to a 1 bedroom apartment, I haven’t booted it. It’s just a 70 pound coffee table now. :/

  • kalleboo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    All my stuff is running on a 6-year-old Synology D918+ that has a Celeron J3455 (4-core 1.5 GHz) but upgraded to 16 GB RAM.

    Funny enough my router is far more powerful, it’s a Core i3-8100T, but I was picking out of the ThinkCentre Tiny options and was paranoid about the performance needed on a 10 Gbit internet connection

  • ordellrb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    kind of… a “AMD GX-420GI SOC: quad-core APU” the one with no L3 Cache, in an Thin Client and 8Gb Ram. old Laptop ssd for Storage (128GB) Nextcloud is usable but not fast.

    edit: the Best thing: its 100% Fanless

      • Sentau@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 hours ago

        This was common in budget laptops 10 years ago. I had a Asus laptop with the same resolution and I have seen others with this resolution as well

        • Petter1@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 hours ago

          😆nice

          I just learned that this resolution resulted from 4:3 screens which got some wideness added to reach 16:9 from an awesome person in this comment thread 😊

          • VoteNixon2016@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 hours ago

            I had to check the post not logged in, weirdly I only see your comment when I’m logged in, but yeah, I (almost) only ever ssh into it, so I never really noticed the resolution until you pointed it out

      • viking@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Some old netbook I guess, or unsupported hardware and a driver default. If all you need is ssh, the display resolution hardly matters.

          • kalleboo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            10 hours ago

            Most 720p TVs (“HD Ready”) used to be that resolution since they re-used production lines from 1024x768 displays

            • Petter1@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              10 hours ago

              Ahh, I see, they took the 4:3 Standard screen and let it grow to 16:9, that makes a lot of sense 😃

              I am to young for knowing 4:3 resolutions 😆

  • Pixel@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    I had a old Acer SFF desktop machine with a Athlon II 435 X3 (equivalent to the Intel Core i3-560) with a 95W TDP, 4 GB of DDR2 RAM, and 2 1TB hard drives running in RAID 0 (both HDDs had over 30k hours by the time I put it in). The clunker consumed 50W at idle. I planned on running it into the ground so I could finally send it off to a computer recycler without guilt.

    The thing would not die. I used it as a dummy machine to run one-off scripts I wrote, a seedbox that would seed new Linux ISOs as it was released (genuinely), a Tor Relay and at one point, a script to just endlessly download Linux ISOs overnight to measure bandwidth over the Chinanet backbone.

    It was a terrible machine by 2023, but I found I used it the most because it was my playground for all the dumb things that I wouldn’t subject my regular home production environments to. Finally recycled it last year, after 5 years of use, when it became apparent it wasn’t going to die and far better USFF 1L Tiny PC machines (i5-6500T CPUs) were going on eBay for $60. The power usage and wasted heat of an ancient 95W TDP CPU just couldn’t justify its continued operation.

  • Pope-King Joe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 hours ago

    The oldest hardware I’m still using is an Intel Core i5-6500 with 48GB of RAM running our Palworld server. I have an upgrade in the pipeline to help with the lag, because the CPU is constantly stressed, but it still will run game servers.

  • aluminium@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Odd, I have a Celeron J3455 which according to Intel only supports 8GB, yet I run it with 16 GB