recursive_recursion@piefed.ca to Canada@lemmy.caEnglish · 4 days agoHow a woods ban to fight wildfires turned some Canadians into toddlersi.ytimg.comimagemessage-square26linkfedilinkarrow-up165arrow-down16file-text
arrow-up159arrow-down1imageHow a woods ban to fight wildfires turned some Canadians into toddlersi.ytimg.comrecursive_recursion@piefed.ca to Canada@lemmy.caEnglish · 4 days agomessage-square26linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareCypher@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down16·edit-23 days agoI could have missed it but I don’t recall her video saying the restrictions were intended to be temporary. Edit: anyone thinking this was a claim of permanent restrictions lacks reading comprehension
minus-squareLemmyoutofhere@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·3 days agoYou forgot your tin foil hat.
minus-squareVictor Villas@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up7·3 days agoOnly conspiracy nuts would entertain the possibility that this isn’t getting lifted whenever the wildfire risk goes down
minus-squareganryuu@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up3·3 days agoSo, “not temporary” is different from “permanent” how exactly?
minus-squareCypher@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down2·2 days agoI didn’t make a claim I just said it wasn’t in the linked video.
I could have missed it but I don’t recall her video saying the restrictions were intended to be temporary.
Edit: anyone thinking this was a claim of permanent restrictions lacks reading comprehension
lol
You forgot your tin foil hat.
Only conspiracy nuts would entertain the possibility that this isn’t getting lifted whenever the wildfire risk goes down
So, “not temporary” is different from “permanent” how exactly?
I didn’t make a claim I just said it wasn’t in the linked video.