

Not really, a system that employs first past the post and a house of fucking lords that is based on blood lines is it really the closest approximation of the will of the people?
I couldn’t care less about the tobacco industry I’m arguing for the peoples right to choose what they do with their own bodies, there is a big difference but cool. Have a good day :)









100% education, harm reduction, support and regulation.
It would empower people to make smarter choices about what they consume and the safe ways and doses to consume and what effects to expect rather than scaremongering people with lies which causes experimentation.
Support people that have existing problems to make better choices with their life rather than turning them into “criminals” which then encourages further behaviour that damages society as a whole.
Regulate the substances so that people can know what they are buying is what it is meant to be so they aren’t buying stuff cut with brick dust or plaster board from people in situations that put them at further risk.
And finally tax it and use that tax money to fund public services. Fund things that benefit society as a whole and benefits everyone else who don’t choose to use these things.
Proper research that hasn’t been fabricated to support the lies that are constantly pedalled has proved that all of these things are true and most of these “hard drugs” are safer and less addictive when done properly than alcohol is and that shit is legal. You can’t just look at all the immediate effects either no one is taking MDMA and then going out and fighting or beating their significant other yet alcohol is the fuel for a very large percentage of anti social behaviour and domestic abuse. Women in particular suffer a massive amount at the hands of predominantly men under the influence of alcohol but I’m meant to believe these cunts when they tell me weed or MDMA is “bad”
But I digress, I could rant on this for ages!