• 0 Posts
  • 5 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 21st, 2023

help-circle
  • thedirtyknapkin@lemmy.worldto196@lemmy.blahaj.zonecolors rule
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    22 hours ago

    I’m having trouble following you here, but it sounds like you’re just saying that the other colora are derived from mixing the primaries. that doesn’t make the colors you get from that a mental illness??

    is mud not real because it’s just wet dirt? is steel not real because it’s just iron with added carbon? that’s silly.

    if your only point is that non primary colors are made by mixing primary colors then congrats, you’ve taught a kindergarten lesson very badly.


  • thedirtyknapkin@lemmy.worldto196@lemmy.blahaj.zonecolors rule
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    oh don’t worry, there’s multiple specific ways to define colors. you can go out and buy a book that literally just has thousands of defined tones and their specific names. chartreuse has a hex code and a specific rgb value for example. you’re right though, laymen don’t have the right vocabulary to define colors specifically.

    the only real point you have here is that color is defined by human perception. even the colors you call real are just abstractions based on what range of wavelength is visible to human perception.

    all colors are defined be human perception. the only way to remove yourself from that is to use strict wavelengths. or you can realize you are a human and the only meaningful way to define this is by our perception.


  • thedirtyknapkin@lemmy.worldto196@lemmy.blahaj.zonecolors rule
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    oh my God, you don’t make pink by combining red and blue, you make pink by decreasing the intensity of the red.

    my whole point was that color is a percieved thing. it is more than wavelength. you are trying to say the only thing that can be defined as color is the wavelength of light. there’s more to it than that. like, congrats you proved that hue is not the only thing that defines color. well done. unfortunately reality exists. we can go and point to red, pink, and purple and differentiate then mathematically with scientific tools. to say that isn’t color is incorrect and pedantic.

    hue is just frequency. color includes intensity and color mixture. if you want to say that color is just a percieved experience and isn’t real then sure maybe you have a point, but that means all color.

    what you really mean is that pink and other colors aren’t on the rainbow. that doesn’t make them not real.

    and yes hue, saturation, and luminance are abstractions. much like acceleration is an abstraction of distance over time over time. that’s why i also defined it by color mixing terms. i can pull out a spectrum analyzer right now and show you saturation and luminance with data.


  • thedirtyknapkin@lemmy.worldto196@lemmy.blahaj.zonecolors rule
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    look at this guy who only understands hue LMAO

    light has three parts that are needed to define color. hue, saturation, luminance. the difference between orange and brown is saturation. a thing that affects color visually undeniably. you can’t just throw a hue chart at us and pretend the other parts don’t exist.

    you can achieve this result through rgb color mixing by controlling percentages. for example magenta is going to be like 50% red. and 50% blue. pink is just 20% red. your chart only shows colors at 100% intensity and additive mixing. color behaves differently whether you’re mixing light or pigments. light will combine to create white. you literally have to combine the different frequencies. this is additive mixing and where rgb is used. there is also subtractive mixing where color is defined by what frequencies are reflected and which are absorbed. when you mix all the colors together this way you get black, because all frequencies will be absorbed. this method uses ryb as its primaries.

    so this all really depends on whether we’re looking at additive or subtractive. you seem to be a little confused on your color swatches there. following additive mixing, like you seem to be, you should say white is real and black isn’t. though neither is true. they’re just 100,100,100 and 0,0,0 respectively.

    -a professional colorist and videographer


  • yeah lol, I’m often plugging in slightly high impedance headphones that it just can’t drive very well. it’s never seemed worth it run run a dac or get a special pair of phone headphones. i rarely use it that way anyway.

    but yeah, pretty much every time i plug them in i have to confirm i want to hurt myself before it will allow them to be set to a useable volume.

    and yes, i do still have a headphone jack, they are still out there if you’re willing to not get a super expensive phone.