Mozilla has been downhill for the last few years, first the opt out processing of your search data, then all the AI integration of bullshit, now the weird changes to their terms of use…

I don’t think that’s where a lot of donors (especially but not exclusively conservative donors) want their money going, and I don’t think Wikipedia’s donation requests would lead people to understand that that’s where some of their money would be going.

Why are you trying to frame this as if wikipedia was lying on where their funding goes when your own source is their own transparency article?

Maybe it would be safer in a more known freelancer platform like Fiverr? Im sure there are problems with that one too, but im also sure she will have more protection than in an unknown one.

edit: they even have already a category for video editing fiverr.com/categories/video-animation/video-editing