Alt Text for Banner Image: The WTMJ logo from the 90s. At the top the logo says “today’s” and on the bottom left corner, it says “TMJ” and on the bottom right corner it says “4”.

Alt Text for Profile Image: The mid-80s logo of WTTV, a four with the horizontal bar leading into the letters WTTV

We’re DECSystem10, though sinza is a convenient singular entity that we tend to use I as. We are a plural collective!

I enjoy retrocomputing and find that NetBSD is awesome! In general I prefer BSD to Linux actually.

I enjoy getting old computers to talk to each other, as well as alternatives to the web where possible like Gopher, Gemini, and Spartan!

  • 2 Posts
  • 16 Comments
Joined 2 months ago
cake
Cake day: September 15th, 2026

help-circle





  • sinza@piefed.socialtoBSD@programming.dev•AlpineBSD
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 days ago

    Yeah, iirc it was a former NetBSD developer who made Void.

    Alpine still honestly feels more BSDish in some ways than Void to me. Probably has to do with Alpine’s install scripts being similar to OpenBSD’s.

    I’ll be honest, I’ve learned the hard way that there really isn’t any 1:1 BSD experience on Linux. Some may have similar packaging systems, but the base system depends on packages on Linux-based OSes. A shame because my favorite thing about BSDs is that packages are optional.

    That being said, I do think the most BSD-like experience with the Linux kernel is going to be Chimera Linux, which was, funnily enough, created by a former Void developer.








  • The policy doesn’t seem to be a full ban on AI within the distribution’s infrastructure, permitting some usage such as for translation and for research.

    For anything else, this would be a mild annoyance to me.

    For a Linux distribution, not fully banning AI is a dealbreaker for me due to the direction that the Linux kernel is going. Thus the resistance that a Linux distribution does against AI must be stronger for me to consider it, especially when there are other Unix-like OSes that have less AI-generated code due to not using the Linux kernel.

    This line of thinking also helps me narrow down Linux distributions to recommend.


  • Regrettably, I don’t think there’s a good middle ground distribution that’s anti-AI. It’s either very technical distributions like Chimera and Gentoo or opinionated distributions geared towards newcomers like elementary OS or more specialized distributions like Nura (formerly postmarketOS) that are explicitly anti-AI.

    I think your best bet would be to go with elementary OS, honestly. It uses its own DE, Pantheon, rather than KDE, but I think it’s easily your least worst option. I’ve never used it extensively myself, however.

    Of course, I also am obligated to mention that the Linux kernel is extremely pro-AI. However, an anti-AI Linux distribution is leagues better than using, say, Windows when it comes to AI.

    That being said, here’s a list of distributions known to be affected by AI as well as those that are anti-AI.


  • If you’re willing to use OpenBSD, there’s OpenBSD.amsterdam as far as cloud providers go :^)

    In all seriousness, they donate about 15-20% of what they charge you to the OpenBSD Foundation. I also like their service. Though again, they are OpenBSD-exclusive, so I can’t say I recommend the service for your use case (which seems Linux-focused) unless you really want to switch to OpenBSD.

    SQLite also has licenses you can pay for as well as support contracts you can get, though not a cloud provider.

    Unfortunately, I don’t really know of anything similar in the Linux world or in regards to other databases and cloud providers nowadays. I know DigitalOcean in particular decided to abandon all of their FOSS donations except towards Omarchy for some reason.