Tom’s is one of the few channels I have notifications on for because when he posts it’s always an instant watch.

When I first read this I misunderstood it to mean “too long so I used ai to summarize it”… So maybe that potential to misunderstand is a counterargument to its use.

Then again maybe I’m just dumb haha.

I really like this. Thanks for sharing.

Clearly this is someone who actually reads their books. Given that they are mass market paperbacks… I have no problem with this. If I were an author I would much rather someone does this to my work and actually reads it and enjoys it to someone keeping a pristine copy unopened on their shelf forever.

Follow the instructions on the curry box. It should break apart into pieces like a chocolate bar.

You can also just add one square at a time and keep tasting it until it’s the strength you want.

Start by boiling potatoes, carrots, onion. When they soften add roux. It’s a pretty forgiving recipe

頑張って！

This seems like very standard ML. I’m not surprised it works, but also it likely takes a huge amount of training data (i.e. print samples) to recognize a specific machine.

I’ve done stuff like this. For instance I took a pre-trained model that could identify animals and used reinforcement learning to feed it thousands of annotated images of my cats. After this fine-tuning it could reliably tell the difference between them. Useful? Yes. Neat? Yes. But it’s not like it can identify a cat it’s never been trained on.

So it’s interesting and useful, but not as impressive or useful as the article makes it seem.

Also I’m sure something as simple as changing a nozzle or even what slicer is used would completely throw it off.

All of his books are just wonderful.