Glad to see you recognize you were completely wrong and had to shift the conversation to a different topic.

You’re way too rude for somebody this unaware of the topic at hand.

FSR and DLSS are at their core temporal upscalers. They take motion vectors, subpixel samples from jittering objects, and a low resolution scene, and using shaders for FSR or AI models for DLSS, interpolate the existing pixels to fill the entire target resolution. That’s it. This is not frame generation, and they don’t use anything, whatever you meant by that.

You can then, on top of the regular upscaling, enable frame generation to enable an entirely different path that holds frames in the buffer and creates intermediary frames. Those are the fake frames you complained about.

One can use both FSR and DLSS without no frame generation whatsoever, and both were originally created without any type of frame generation to begin with. At the present, Helldivers already uses FSR without frame generation - just for upscaling - but it’s FSR 1.0 (previously called FidelityFX), a matrix based spatial scalar that only looks at one central pixel and tries to apply weights to determine how to fill in the neighbors. This looks horrendous. FSR 2.x and onwards, and DLSS, use the full temporal mechanism I described.

That’s “what the heck” I think DLSS does.

Author(s): Digit (Directing Claude Sonnet 4.0, Mistral, Qwen, opencode (grok), and more)

Oooof

I never said anything about frame generation.

I buy single purpose devices that are fully offline, durable, user serviceable, and useful… and then I go for a long time without buying anything but food. It’s almost like setting a new personal record: how many days in a row I can go without buying a single thing?

Now replace a badly modified version of FSR 1 with support for FSR 3.x, 4.x and DLSS, as we are in 2025 please.

Not simple libs, an entire trust chain from boot to running app that is supposed to improve security and integrity. It also happens to have the side effect of making the entire chain dependent on Google, which I’m sure Google is totally not happy about you know.

The user explained what exactly went wrong later on. The AI gave a list of instructions as steps, and one of the steps was deleting a specific Node.js folder on that D:\ drive. The user didn’t want to follow the steps and just said “do everything for me” which the AI prompted for confirmation and received. The AI then indeed ran commands freely, with the same privilege as the user, however this being an AI the commands were broken and simply deleted the root of the drive rather than just one folder.

So yes, technically the AI didn’t simply delete the drive - it asked for confirmation first. But also yes, the AI did make a dumb mistake.

Like there is a lot of stupidity on reddit but usually someone comes in with actual knowledge

Be careful with that, actually. Reddit mastered repeating an explanation or analogy they read on another thread or saw on YouTube, but being quite eloquent at explaining it. Problem is, if they misunderstood it to begin with, they’ll just as confidently repeat a broken version.

I didn’t notice it at first… then I started seeing explanations for things on my field and cringed at how wrong they were, and then I started noticing the pattern and the very repeated analogies on other areas too.

Kids absolutely love it. Turning in homework made with ChatGPT, even though everything is badly written and they learned nothing, gets celebrated as an act of rebellion. “You gave us all this stupid homework? Well, now you’re powerless, I can use ChatGPT and it’s done!” which completely misses the point of homework.

There are many instances that accept all content (for better or for worse).

The biggest issue is simply not enough people watching. But content restrictions are a thousand times more aggressive on YouTube vs PeerTube

Call me old fashioned, but there are several things I’ll never accept being “smart” and having Wi-Fi, including:

Home appliances, cars, monitors, note taking apparatus, furniture, beverage dispensing mechanisms, cleaning gadgets, pet gadgets, children toys, adult toys, bags, wallets, access keys, plants, birds.

Confiscated for having GrapheneOS? What?

Roasted coffee, beef, juice…

Hmmm… I wonder which tropical country in south america has recently been tarrifed because they arrested their Trump-wannabe…

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

We did such a great job with AI and SEO that most media outlets literally do not understand the basics about the internet or computers, even when you’re reading content that is tech-focused. The media is completely incapable of covering this topic, and might even reproduce the same absurdity such as claiming a graphics driver is a dark web tool.

There are very few real journalists left, and they’re either busy dealing with the tremendous insanity that’s going on everywhere, or they’re being actively supressed.

We should have fought back against the death of journalism, but we didn’t, in fact, for a little while we even celebrated it. The consequences are that now we have a literal abyss between govermental corruption and abuse and the overall public being able to understand and react.

Remember when Facebook wanted more information from teenagers using iPhones, but couldn’t collect that data because they don’t control iOS?

They released a service that required a VPN profile to be installed, and were caught mining the data this way.

Which brings us to Google: how do you collect information about files and photos on Windows when you’re not Microsoft? Easy! How about this convenient new tool to search for all your files? Just please agree to the ToS.

One clear sign is how despite all the money and pressure, companies haven’t been able to actually implement it in useful ways.

Samsung, Apple, Google, Canva, you name it, they invest a billion into integrating AI into their products and what do they get?

A chat box, an image object remover, bad image generation, a translator. Sure, all things users were impressed by… Two years ago. Its always the same.

My banking app decided to update adding “innovative AI features!” which meant… Any guesses?

Instead of typing the value, pressing OK, and selecting a contact for a bank transfer - which is fast and easy - I now need to type into a chat box “Transfer X amount to Person Y” and this obnoxiously bad AI will reply with emojis, two wrong pieces of information, and take double the time to complete the same task.

You know, I think there might be stupid questions after all