Those people would be unemployed, or (WAY more generously) need to be retrained and transferred to other jobs.
I don’t find “the orphan grinder technicians would need to find new jobs” a very compelling argument, but I imagine the orphan grinder technicians and their families do.
We should probably have basic income and stronger social programs, too. But we have a republican party that would rather die of measles than see their outgroup have one iota of comfort.
Also, “it would be expensive to improve our quality of life, so let’s leave the nightmare in place” is a bonkers view.
I’m skeptical that cost overall is a good argument in favor of single payer, at least in the short/medium term.
But maybe this is the important part. An argument for who? I think most of the people who oppose single payer health care are doing so for emotional reasons, so facts and charts won’t compel them. They might lie to you and themselves about how the money doesn’t work out, but those are lies.
Has this been covered anywhere?