Didn’t ask, but why did you tell me?

Yes, it is interesting that people who discuss things in good faith blame bad faith discussion (and the time wasted therein) on those who choose it.

Incorrect.

Willingly baiting someone to read nonsense in bad faith makes you responsible for wasting their time. You don’t get to blame the victim for being willing to engage in good faith.

Bad faith is bad, good faith isn’t, that’s why they’re called that.

Why are you wasting my time like I want replies from liars?

“Right” or “good” censorship, as you call it, is censoring bots from political discussion, or censoring pedophiles from a kids’ TV channel, not censoring humans from political discussion.

People are controlling my speech on instances that take a more active stance to moderation, and therefore aren’t worthy of federation.

That isn’t very well-written wording, but I can’t spot the lie.

What false premise do you think it’s based on? Apparently, that you’re censored - but I didn’t say you’re censored, if you’re fine with ambulance rides charging money, so where’s that false premise actually appear in my train of thought or connect to the statement you’re trying to connect it to? I said censorship exists, and I implied it applies to people who want ambulance rides to be free - I didn’t say anything about you personally.

If you think ambulance rides should cost money, that’s a false premise, but it doesn’t change anything I said - the idea that it does would be a second false premise.

Is it that you think ambulance rides shouldn’t cost money, but political discussion doesn’t impact policy? Because it does, so that would still be you with the false premise.

Is that you’re aware of both why ambulance rides should be free and how political discourse impacts that, but you’re not understanding how you need a majority to win elections? Because you do, so that would still be you with the false premise.

Do you understand all that, but think Tor users are a majority? Because they’re not, so that would still be you with the false premise.

I can’t see how you get from me saying “there is censorship” to “Cowbee isn’t censored and there is no censorship” without using a false premise. Meanwhile “there is censorship” remains a true premise.

So .world is extremely anti free speech? Is there an easy way I can block all of .world from my feed then?