Good for him for catching up with the rest of us.

Impeachment and conviction is the answer.

What I meant with the runner analogy is that coding is a skill just like running. If you let a machine do it for you for long enough, you lose that skill.

Except when you do that, you only get 3 hours of boring lame video games, rather than 5 whole seconds of thrilling slop.

Dropout.tv

The only streaming service I won’t pirate.

You know I just checked, and my landlord doesn’t take AI tokens.

A weapon?

I don’t think the dev of Lutris is an insane twat waffle. He and I just disagree on the use of AI code. I foresee the project’s quality declining because of it, and I’d prefer to jump ship now. Lutris wasn’t a big part of my system, so it was really easy. Basically I only ever used it to run WinSCP on Linux.

I just removed Lutris and tried out Bottles last night. How have I never tried it before? It’s so good!

shot in the back last year as he fled from officers

found that the shooting was justified because Best had a gun in his hand

Fuck this country. How about you follow your own Constitution?

I said, in the issue, I was talking about the US.

More like, “why would I, an avid runner, who has trained in running for over a decade, run five blocks when I can just drive”.

That’s fucking bleak. Maybe this is the dev equivalent of AI psychosis. AI paralysis?

deleted by creator

If all you do is prompt the AI, “hey, fix bugs in this repo,” then you had no creative input into what it produces. So that kind of code would not be copyrightable, 100%. You can fight it in court, but the Supreme Court refusing to hear it means the lower court’s decision is settled law, and your chances of winning are essentially zero.

Whether code where you hold its hand and basically pair program with it is copyrightable hasn’t been settled. Considering the dev said he does it both ways, the point is rather moot, since for sure, he doesn’t own the copyright to at least some of that AI generated code.

OpenClaw is an autonomous system just like the one in that article, and the dev said that’s what he’s using at least some of the time. It generates and commits code without human intervention.

That’s not how the dev said he’s generating code. He said sometimes he does it without any intervention at all.

Also, that’s potentially copyrightable. That hasn’t been settled.

As of March 2, it has been settled. AI generated works must have substantial human creative input in order to be copyrightable. Prompting the AI does not meet that requirement.

https://www.morganlewis.com/pubs/2026/03/us-supreme-court-declines-to-consider-whether-ai-alone-can-create-copyrighted-works

In other words, if the AI wrote the code, and you didn’t change it since then, it’s not yours at all. It’s public domain, no question.

Here’s my issue with this specifically. It makes Lutris very vulnerable to being considered entirely public domain:

https://github.com/lutris/lutris/issues/6538

It’s a sort of natural protection from snakes. They evolved that way to protect their ankles from the snake bites.

Does he think Donald Trump is as much of a victim for having his dick bitten as the underage girl that he murdered for doing it?