I am amused by you playing dumb to avoid answering the question. It’s not about a specific event.
Do you think Italy (hosts) or IOC (organizers) should deny participation to US athletes due to USA’s invasion of Venezuela? Do you think China back in 2008 (or again the IOC) should have refused USA’s athletes due to the USA’s occupation of Iraq?
If not why not?
Is invading a country only an issue at European competitions? Not the Olympics?
Let’s do get in “whataboutism” aka consistency aka non hypocrisy. What about the USA now with Venezuela or if they invade Greenland? During their decade long occupation of Iraq?
What is your excuse for that? The US is also the next biggest offender in Olympics doping after Russia.
Do they have him in custody?
Except, as I have quoted, the USA did this to enforce a decision made by it’s domestic court.
The operation was undertaken to enforce a warrant from a U.S. federal court
Today our UK Armed Forces showed skill and professionalism in support of a successful U.S. interception of the vessel Bella 1 while on its way to Russia. This action formed part of global efforts to crack down on sanctions busting.
Well, certainly don’t count on the UK to support international law.
And yet there was a whole saga where world admins claimed being pro Luigi, especially mentioning jury nullification, constituted advocating for violence and they had to remove such posts due to ‘EU law’ according to legal advice they totally received.
New mods? Sir, this Lemmy.world .
Well a big part of the world needs to cleanse it self of US loyalists in it’s politics, military and intelligence/security. It’s going to be tough, a lot of expertise is going to be lost and the rebuild is going to be hard.
After that they can boycott and sanction the USA but they need to militarize to protect themselves. Expansion of nuclear weapons is a good tactic if you can get it to happen fast. Tactical ones as well to strike at US expeditionary assets.
It’s not going to be pretty, stopping the Nazis was not pretty.
Leader of the free world has quite a history, full of violations of other countries sovereignty.
They don’t mind regime change or unprovoked aggression against other countries. The US has a long history of such actions with no protest from the populace. Even Vietnam, the protest was about them having to risk their lives on the war. This time it’s because Trump is also dangerous to some of them.
So it’s not about all decks being the same.
Money, gambling is (even if obfuscated via tokens) about money.
Monopoly is not gambling because there is no (real) money involved. Uno is not gambling because there is no money involved.
Perhaps now that nvidia’s new driver excludes gtx-1000 series and older you would have to enter some commands to switch over gracefully.
For my 2070 to 5070 upgrade nothing was needed.
He is not acting for Putin, at least not directly. Trump of course, he is the US president, leader of the free world.
There are thousands more in European military, politics and other institutions that are loyal to the US more than the EU. They grew up and came into whatever position they now hold in a system where Europe was de facto subordinate the USA for decades.
Needless to say for a truly independent Europe they are going to be a problem.
Reactionary forks don’t have a great record of success (or even getting off the ground).
And how is actual real life in America?
Somebody call an ambulance!!
So what? He will invade Greenland, get voted out and everything will turn back to normal? Because you disapproved of said actions?