Fair enough. Then I guess it’s up to people like me to point out that the guys a giant douche and we should find actual positive role models and not lean on shit bags like Notch. Especially ones who try to take all the credit when their team did most the actual work you know and love. Lest we forget notch was so bad at programming that the creepers were originally supposed to be pigs.
“Fascist makes a good point” isn’t the flex you seem to think it is. If anything it makes you second guess the idea because “oh shit, that turd brain agrees with me? Maybe I misunderstood something…”. Next you’ll tell me Elon Musk agrees as well like that means diddly squat.
Doesn’t mean we should publicize every broken clock. There are plenty of working clocks we could highlight instead.
And that’s all for analyzing statements. You can’t just do that to some words and discover objective truth out of nowhere, so I’m not sure what you think you’re accomplishing here. What you’re linking is more analogous to the code that underlies an AI(if/while loops and whatnot). Reasoning is closer to the scientific method of forming a hypothesis and whatnot than anything you linked.
You basically just pointed out that there’s a math system for logic. Neat.
I think for a third party to even exist viably, we need ranked choice voting. If Elon wants this party to actually exist, he needs RCV himself. Unless he’s just planning to try and consume all of the moderate voters, which is a good bet too based on his ego, unfortunately.
I’m hoping the Dems split into a proper labor party as well
Yes, and without it, any third party struggles to take hold. This new party could make ranked choice voting a bipartisan(tripartisan?) issue since they would need it to survive unless they really think they can just yank all of the R votes their way.
The fact that you call Bernie “the fringe” and dismiss him, his recent rallys, the Philadelphia sanitation union strike, and so much more shows you just want to be defeatist and spout strawmen. I guess AOC doesn’t exist either. So have fun being miserable I guess.
A new “Republican” party would necessarily have to argue for vote reform in order to make gains. We might be able to spin this into a bipartisan issue. We make it their own self interest to introduce ranked choice voting.
You act as if unions are non-existent and Bernie Sanders has no following… Unlikely? Sure. But impossible? Nope. Literally half the Dem talk since the election has been about how much Dems feel disenfranchised by their own party. Have you been paying any attention?
Ok, call me crazy, but hear me out: this is good and we should encourage it.
One fascist party gets all the fascists aligned. Multiple fascist parties split them up. Suddenly their 51% majority is 25% and 26%. We should be fostering the infighting and splitting of the party. We should welcome its own destruction from within.
I’ll only believe it when I see it, but this could theoretically be the beginning of the end for a two party system. If done right we could end up with 4 or 5 legitimate parties (including splitting Democrats up and getting a true labor party)
If you’re concerned about those kind of things, your concerned about a state-level actor. Do you really think that is gonna subvert them? You’re getting into the realm of paranoia. A PO box (paid for in cash) is for shipping drugs off the dark net and not having it attached to your identity easily. If you’re concerned about surveillance and fingerprints being taken, you’re on a whole different level. You should probably ditch your computer and cellphone…
$10 says the “disproportional usage” is largely tied to them not “working” on the Sabbath and using disposable utensils as a loophole.
Yes, and I’m here criticizing “actually existing science”. That’s exactly my point. It’s not “real science” when it’s injected with politics and emotions like that. It’s biased in a way science shouldn’t be.
Wtf are you going on about? I’m talking about changing the name of a plant because it’s discoverer was a racist. Nothing about politicians or pedophiles. Ffs, some of you have brain rot as bad as the MAGA. I’m literally saying that history should remain accurate and not try to whitewash away the negatives.
I think you’re confusing “politics injected into science” with science. Science is data and analyzing it. Pretending someone didn’t invent something is removing data points and I’m pretty sure science calls that fraud, just like we call the studies that found cigarettes healthy to be frauds, or the oil companies to be frauds. 2 wrongs don’t make a right.
Remember, it’s only “revisionist history” if it’s the history you don’t like. Otherwise it’s “because totally valid reasons”.
“unless you’re a part of the community fuck you”
I can see why it got heated…
Contact your doctor and ask to be tested for ADHD because holy shit you have this or something akin. Let me guess, you also cycle through hobbies constantly and have 100 projects you’re “working on” right?
Here’s a bit of advice: if you can’t even remember what all the tabs have in them or which is which or what’s important(which you constantly allude to when talking about searching through them)…NONE OF IT IS. It’s the easiest ADHD clutter cleanup method: if you can’t even remember that something specific exists and it’s just a giant generic pile, it’s all junk. If it really mattered, you’d have already sorted it or remembered it. Now it’s just hanging around as emotional baggage.
Dump all of it and if any of it actually happens to have been important, you’ll find it again if you really need it. If you don’t find it again, then you didn’t need it in the first place. And start using something to actually take notes and sort this shit. 2000+ tabs is insanity if this isn’t a troll.