Give her lanyard a read.

My favorite is irregardless, having an identical meaning to “regardless”, just because linguistics nerds get so tilted by it.

Funner follow-up: this definition is correct and true to the original usage of “factoid”, however, the alternative definition meaning “a small or minor fact” has been used often enough that it’s generally accepted, and appears in several dictionaries. Ain’t English grand!?

Sources:

• https://en.m.wiktionary.org/wiki/factoid
• https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/factoid
• https://www.oed.com/dictionary/factoid_n

Yeah… what a shame. These poor tortured souls have to settle for Dipl. Ass. instead.

OSRS player spotted.

Yeah this is an easy Shiloh angle for me. I’m down for some Radiohead every now and then, and when I’m not, that’s what noise cancelling headphones are for.

The smoke is gathering at the top of the frame like that because the building has an overhang at the entrance. Presumably the security camera that caught the footage in the article you linked is mounted on the overhang.

Same here. They put me on a short round of it because it apparently can kickstart a sluggish sinus system to start draining properly again. It did that, and it also gave me the locked in kind of focus that people claim to get from Adderall, but I didn’t have any twitching or jitters. I was just fully in the zone, the Predni-zone.

I don’t recall having brought any of that up? At any rate, it seems like whatever your occupation is, it’s pretty stressful. That sucks.

Woah hey now all I said was you probably had a busy day at work. A little weird to bring up bots and teams of bad actors dude, chill.

Ah so you were late to /c/politics. Well I suppose we all have busy days at work sometimes. You’ll get ‘em next time champ.

Unfortunately if I name this person there’s a good likelihood this discussion gets removed since the rules prohibit calling out bad faith actors, even the painstakingly obvious ones. So I’ll leave you with this: you needn’t look far to find that which you seek.

Hmm… I wonder why a certain user who’s been posting non-stop about third-party candidates for the entire lifespan of their account chose to ignore this particular article. One would assume it’s important for the voting public to know about this, no?