Historic definitions only matter in historic text.
The currently popular definitions are “attraction to your own and different genders” and “attraction regardless of gender”.

They’re also, more accurately, calling it an exploit and a security vulnerability.

It’d be good for Android to be mostly its base, the Android Open Source Project. Over the years Google put more and more things in the proprietary part of Android (Google Play Services) instead of AOSP.

Depends on who takes over whether that gets better of course. If they also put too much in Play Services, or ask the manufacturers for a high fee, yes it’s possible we go back to more oem flavours.

I guess this means we’re not switching to RCS then?