Which one do you prefer?

That’s risky (criminal level risky)

(lifeless voice) “Thank you for choosing AT&T”

Ah… miss those times I see?

Epstein.

I suspect he was clearly seeing that it’s a snowman and hit it deliberately.

Poor guy

He’s like Midas, but with shit.

You can’t look at any piece of written human history that doesn’t involve conquering land from others

You can, if the land was free of people before you.

How?

Uyghurs were killed like ukrainians or palestinians?

Unfortunately:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persecution_of_Uyghurs_in_China?wprov=sfla1

At least China wants to make money, others not only money

But your original comment is still untrue.

I see if we compare China, Russia, Usa and Israel, the China looks the most peaceful in that comparison.

Uyghurs would like to have a word.

Even Trump?

Validity of his anger depends on where the snowman was placed before the hit: if it was on the road…

The Tiananmen massacre also was a non-profit endeavour.

Amazon jungle tribals area
Greenland (yet)

That’s what first comes to mind.

Maybe you should rephrase your point?

Probably lead paints

Soldiers from these allies fought and died in Afghanistan and Iraq

And that’s why alienating from the US is good for them.

they paid $10 a dose

Happy people! Here in Russia LSD costs almost 5 times more!

That’s a pretty loose analogy, considering the amount of differences and time of branching.

I trust them on chemical properties and pharmacokinetics

However, here’s another paper:
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6494066/