SoyViking [he/him]

  • 0 Posts
  • 71 Comments
Joined 5 years ago
cake
Cake day: November 4th, 2020

help-circle












  • I think I agree with most of what you say. Sex work is horribly exploitative and most sex workers are driven into sex work from precarity.

    On the other hand, who am I to tell someone who finds sex work to be the lesser evil compared to a grueling minimum wage job that they’re wrong?

    I think it is important to be pro-sex worker. I think you can be this while acknowledging the harm of the sex industry. Personally I don’t think bans and cops are the right response. You can compare this to how doing drugs is obviously bad for you but sending cops to arrest people with substance abuse disorders is only making things worse.

    My personal belief is that the best way forward is harm reduction. Both when it comes to the actual sex work (unionisation, labour safety standards, legal protections) but also when it comes to the social factors that promotes sex work. Nobody should be coerced into sex work because the alternative is poverty or mistreatment, any moral society should help people long before they get that desperate. That help should also include adequate and compassionate responses to substance abuse, such as providing patients with free, safe drugs so that they are not forced into crime or prostitution. I also think harm reduction includes social attitudes to sex work, it doesn’t make anything better that sex work is considered shameful and that terms for sex workers are used as misogynistic slurs.

    I’m afraid that pushing for criminalisation acts as a bandaid that allows liberals to call it a day and avoid dealing with the harmful structural social factors that causes sex work and worse its outcomes



  • A closely related thing that has bothered me for quite some time is the way supposedly anti-racist liberals love to spread the trope of racists being “losers who have failed at life” and framing racism as a disease of the lower class.

    It’s wrong on several levels. There are plenty of majority-ethnic poor people who are not racist. In fact, they are more likely to live and work among racialised people and be less susceptible to racist propaganda.

    And at the other end of the scale, there are plenty of people who have been very successful under capitalism who hold racist beliefs. These people are a lot more dangerous than some frothingfash shouting slurs and they are allowed to slip under the radar when every discussion about racism has to be about the racist “losers”.

    The trope also exposes liberal class hatred. To the liberal mind, the most morally reprehensible thing you can be is not to be an exploiter, a parasite or an oppressor — it is to be poor.






  • Pelle Dragsted is at it again, penning another love letter to the social democratic welfare state. His fantasy of reforming our way to socialism is a cozy mirage for conflict-averse Scandinavians, promoting a socialism where class analysis and class struggle has been replaced by the fairy tales about democracy we were told in social studies class in school.

    First order of business: There is no such thing as Nordic socialism in the real world. The Nordic countries are all bourgeois capitalist states in which a class compromise gives workers some comforts without challenging the fundamental ownership of the means of production.

    He ignores that the Nordic model’s comforts were won through struggle that was only possible because the October Revolution had put the fear of Jesus in the hearts of the corridor and that the relatively high standard of living is funded by imperialist superprofits extracted from the periphery. His myopic focus on the national realm refuses to confront this parasitic relationship.

    Worse, his premise is naively idealist. It assumes the bourgeoisie, upon seeing his “shards of socialism,” will simply surrender their power. History screams otherwise. What happened to Allende? What happened to the Indonesian communists? The moment capital feels threatened, it abandons democratic pretense for violent reaction. The bourgeois state is not a neutral tool; it is structurally designed to protect the dictatorship of the bourgeoisie.

    But Dragsted would never get far enough to become a Nordic Allende. At best he would be another Corbyn and get destroyed by the character assassination of the reactionary press.

    Dragsted’s gradualist plan of sovereign wealth funds and co-ops is dependent on maintaining electoral success for decades and is useless as a realistic response to a capital strike. Also, it offers no answer to the physical violence any socialist project will face from the bourgeoisie.

    The old syndicalist Christian Christensen once wrote:

    Parliament is like the wastebin at a slaughterhouse, full of rotten chunks of meat. Do you think they go fresh again by throwing a piece of good meat in there, or do you think it is them who poison the fresh?

    Dragsted used to punch Nazis when he was younger. Back then he understood that some enemies can’t be appeased but must be defeated. But now, after having been pickled in the wastebin for decades, he has turned into a completely harmless round, fluffy social democrat.