• 0 Posts
  • 6 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: August 14th, 2023

help-circle
  • Screws maybe

    But you have to machine a hole in the metal for the screw to function

    You know how hard it would be to drill a hole for a screw in a cave with scrap parts and no power drill?

    All you need to crudely weld, probably as strong as a screw, is heat. Fire is easy in a cave.

    I’d wager they could melt some metal together before devising a cave drill press.

    We have no idea what metal or alloy it is. They could have an alloy that melts easily, but once hard, it adheres to other metals and practically unbreakable. Just find some scraps of that alloy to easily weld.



  • I’ve snapped so many Robertson bits in my life. Screws are fine.

    1 5/8" cement board screws

    They used to be Robertson. They switched to Torx.

    Night and day difference

    Like you said, they do grip like a mofo, and with an impact driver, the bits snap.

    I tried dozens of different brands of bits. Even paid top dollar for special Milwaukee ones.

    I was at a point where I had to pre-drill and counter sink the screws because I was breaking too many bits.

    I could probably drive a torx head one through a board


  • I wasn’t saying it was the best way, just a way. I’m not sure if it is the best. But the most simple way to make sure everyone’s basic needs are met is to give everyone their basic needs and then figure out who has enough to give to others.

    The flaw with capitalism is that someone of no “value” gets no value

    If a company can lay off one worker and become more efficient, that is great in capitalism. Just the one worker gets screwed.

    If that worker was say a robot where you could sit it on the shelf and not worry about it, then that’s fine. But that worker is a human with needs and capitalism doesn’t help that person because they have no “value”.

    The idea that we have to manufacture jobs for these people to “earn” money to live is another solution.

    Putting money into the hands of the poor stimulates the economy.

    It can stimulate the economy, it’s not a guarantee.

    Always enjoyed this story:

    Two economists are walking in a forest

    The first economist says to the other “I’ll pay you $100 to eat that pile of shit.” The second economist takes the $100 and eats the pile of shit.

    They continue walking until they come across a second pile of shit. The second economist turns to the first and says “I’ll pay you $100 to eat that pile of shit.” The first economist takes the $100 and eats a pile of shit.

    Walking a little more, the first economist looks at the second and says, “You know, I gave you $100 to eat shit, then you gave me back the same $100 to eat shit. I can’t help but feel like we both just ate shit for nothing.”

    “That’s not true”, responded the second economist. “We increased the GDP of the forest by $200!”

    That being said, handing money out to everyone has an inflationary effect, so there would have to be some thought put into countering that. And I guarantee payday loan places would find a way to keep the poor impoverished.

    You touched on one reason it wouldn’t be guaranteed.

    Giving loans to people would be better than UBI. UBI should be viewed as a loan and not free money. If you were ever able to pay it back, you should.

    Another problem with capitalism is that a potential worker has no time to hold out for better options. You’re 18 and poor, you have to accept the first job offered as fast as possible or you won’t have shelter or food.

    Giving these people a loan or UBI means they can get by until they find something that benefits them. If they want to tell the fast food place “I’ll do it for $15 and not $12 an hour” it’s possible

    It’s crazy that the difference between $12 and $15 is 25%. A 25% raise is a large one.

    I appreciated reading your comment!


  • Let’s say 50k is average income

    Basic income is 10k

    The average person would get 10k in UBI but pay 10k more in taxes

    They will have 50k dollars

    Someone that makes 100k would get the 10k in UBI but would have to pay 20k more in taxes.

    They will have 90k dollars

    Someone making 15k (federal min wage) would get 10k in UBI and pay nothing in taxes

    They will have 25k dollars

    This is simplified, but the idea is that all three people still made 165k combined. Just the person at the bottom got some help.

    UBI does not increase the total amount of money in the economy. Just moves it from the rich to the poor.

    The average person is still going to have the same spending power

    UBI only exists to solve a problem of capitalism. Other systems could have a UI like communism. But it’s the flaws of capitalism that needs it to correct itself.

    Social programs exist in capitalism and have existed for years. They are just a complex way of solving a basic problem. “How do we get poor people money?”

    Personally, I’d be for UBMI (Universal Bare Minimum Income). Everyone should be provided bare minimum from the society. Food, water, shelter, etc. If you can afford to pay it back, great, if you can’t, that’s fine too. But when people talk about UBI it’s always “how much??”. And it should be the bare minimum to survive and not be forced to run the capitalism rat race. If you’re content to sit in a small shelter and eat 3 meals a day, the government should give it to you. The government gives it to people who break the law and are no where near as deserving